Ensign InfoSecurity alternatives
Compare Ensign InfoSecurity against other MDR providers ranked by feature overlap. Same business model first, then providers taking a different approach.
›› Why look for alternatives
Ensign InfoSecurity may not be the best fit if:
- −North American or European organizations without APAC operations
- −Teams wanting active remediation where the SOC takes containment actions on your behalf
- −Organizations needing transparent, published pricing or per-endpoint rates for budgeting
- −Buyers who rely on public customer reviews and community validation (almost none exist for Ensign)
›› Ensign InfoSecurity at a glance
›› Same model: Services firm
27 providers with the same business model as Ensign InfoSecurity.
Check Point
Best fit for Check Point infrastructure customers who want their MDR team to operate on the same platform they already use. The MDR 360 tier adds genuine vendor-neutral flexibility. Trade-offs: premium pricing, licensing complexity, and no published MDR service metrics (only XDR platform metrics from MITRE).
Check Point and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Check Point covers 5 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
Eviden
Fits European and Middle East enterprise buyers that already work with Atos or want a multinational services firm running their MDR. Pure-play competitors will move faster on SMB and mid-market deals.
Eviden and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Eviden covers 6 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
Hitachi Cyber
Reasonable fit for organizations already inside the Hitachi ecosystem or those that want one vendor covering IT and OT across multiple regions. Buyers shopping on transparent metrics or community reputation will find thinner public evidence than the major pure-play MDRs offer.
Hitachi Cyber and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Hitachi Cyber covers 6 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
Kroll
Kroll Responder's differentiator is depth of real-world IR experience: 3,000+ annual breach investigations feeding detection and response. This is a services firm with MDR, not an MDR vendor with services. Complete Response methodology, included $1M breach warranty, and direct escalation to IR/forensics teams set it apart. December 2025 CrowdStrike migration brings faster response but increases platform dependency.
Kroll and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Kroll covers 5 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
LevelBlue
The largest pure-play MSSP by revenue ($1B+) with the deepest compliance credentials in MDR (FedRAMP, PCI DSS QSA, StateRAMP) and SpiderLabs, a 1,000+ person offensive security team. Cybereason's 100% MITRE ATT&CK detection adds real substance. Trade-off: five acquisitions in two years created a fragmented portfolio of unintegrated platforms, and integration execution remains unproven.
LevelBlue and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
The largest pure-play MSSP by revenue ($1B+) with the deepest compliance credentials in MDR (FedRAMP, PCI DSS QSA, StateRAMP) and SpiderLabs, a 1,000+ person offensive security team. Cybereason's 100% MITRE ATT&CK detection adds real substance. Trade-off: five acquisitions in two years created a fragmented portfolio of unintegrated platforms, and integration execution remains unproven.
Mandiant
Threat intelligence-driven MDR backed by 500+ intel analysts, frontline IR experience, and Google Cloud infrastructure. Best for enterprises facing sophisticated threats who need detection backed by the organization that publishes the industry's most-cited threat intelligence report (M-Trends). Premium pricing and separate IR retainer are the main trade-offs.
Mandiant and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Mandiant covers 5 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
NRI SecureTechnologies
Reasonable fit for organizations with Japan operations that want a Japanese-rooted SOC and a deep CrowdStrike-managed service. Buyers shopping on transparent metrics or community reviews will find thinner public evidence than pure-play Western MDRs offer.
NRI SecureTechnologies and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
NRI SecureTechnologies covers 5 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
NTT Security Holdings
Global SOC coverage, OT/ICS monitoring, and threat intelligence from 40% of global IP prefixes. Vendor-agnostic and works with existing tools. Trade-offs: active response limited to endpoint isolation, no published detection metrics, premium pricing, and regional inconsistency in service quality.
NTT Security Holdings and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
NTT Security Holdings covers 5 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
Orange Cyberdefense
European regulatory accreditations and geographic SOC coverage that few MDR providers can match. Broad service catalog from a single vendor. Trade-off: no published detection metrics, no MITRE participation, and zero practitioner reviews anywhere online.
Orange Cyberdefense and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Orange Cyberdefense covers 5 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
Secureworks
Open XDR MDR with broad integration, CTU threat intelligence (now Sophos X-Ops), strong MITRE results, and included unlimited remote IR. Post-Sophos acquisition: Taegis continues with active investment. Main risk is whether Sophos sustains enterprise Taegis investment long-term.
Secureworks and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Secureworks covers 4 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
Integrity360
CREST-accredited European MDR with seven SOCs and a proprietary detection platform that works with the customer's existing tools. Backed by August Equity with an active acquisition strategy (nine acquisitions in four years). Trade-off: no published detection metrics, virtually zero community review presence, and North American coverage is limited to a January 2026 Canadian acquisition.
Integrity360 and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Integrity360 covers 4 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
LRQA Nettitude
LRQA Nettitude is strongest where MDR is part of a wider assurance, testing and incident-response program. CREST SOC certification, broad CREST accreditations and current NCSC CIR assurance make it credible for regulated and UK buyers. The trade-off is a custom, scope-dependent service with limited public detail on pricing, response authority, SOC locations and measured detection performance.
LRQA Nettitude and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
LRQA Nettitude covers 2 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity.
MAD Security
MAD Security is strongest where MDR is part of a regulated security operations and compliance program. The public materials are specific about DFARS, CMMC, NIST and documentation needs, which is useful for DIB and government-contractor buyers. The trade-off is custom scope, thin independent review evidence and limited public detail on MDR-specific pricing, tool stack, contractual SLAs and specific endpoint actions.
MAD Security and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
MAD Security covers 1 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity.
mnemonic
mnemonic MDR fits European buyers that want an Argus-based service with Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Wiz, network and OT-oriented coverage. The trade-off is commercial opacity, since public materials do not publish prices, fixed SLA terms, warranty terms or all standard containment actions.
mnemonic and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
mnemonic includes incident response.
NCC Group
Consultancy-backed MXDR with Fox-IT's 20+ year SOC heritage and embedded IR team. Best for European enterprise and government buyers running Sentinel or Splunk who want detection depth and IR capability in one provider. Forrester and IDC both recognize the technical quality. Trade-off: only two SIEMs supported, no public reviews from MDR customers, no breach warranty, and MDR is one of many NCC Group business lines.
NCC Group and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
NCC Group covers 4 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
Nomios
Nomios MDR fits European buyers that value EU data hosting, a visitable Dutch SOC and a choice between packaged Cortex XDR MDR and a custom service around existing tools. The trade-off is pricing and SLA opacity: tiers are public, but amounts, service-credit language and breach warranty terms are not.
Nomios and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Nomios covers 4 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
NVISO
NVISO MDR fits European buyers that want a security-operations partner with MDR, CSIRT, threat hunting and advisory depth rather than a narrow endpoint-only service. The trade-off is commercial opacity, since pricing, fixed SLA terms, breach warranty and named containment actions are not published.
NVISO and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
NVISO MDR fits European buyers that want a security-operations partner with MDR, CSIRT, threat hunting and advisory depth rather than a narrow endpoint-only service. The trade-off is commercial opacity, since pricing, fixed SLA terms, breach warranty and named containment actions are not published.
Obrela
Good fit for European/MENA buyers who need OT or maritime MDR and are comfortable with a Microsoft-centric stack. Gartner and Forrester recognize them, and they publish operational metrics most competitors keep private. Trade-off: zero public customer reviews, completely opaque pricing across four tiers, threat hunting as an upsell, and no SOC presence outside Europe/MENA.
Obrela and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Obrela covers 4 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
Optiv
Optiv MDR is strongest when the buyer already has a complex stack and wants MDR as part of SOC modernization on Google Security Operations. The trade-off is commercial opacity: pricing, SLA terms, SOC staffing details and breach-warranty terms are not public, and total cost depends on telemetry volume plus optional services.
Optiv and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Optiv covers 5 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
SecurityHQ
The core draw is keeping your existing EDR stack while adding SOC analyst coverage, backed by a credible MITRE evaluation showing low alert noise. The trade-off: guided response means your team does the remediation work, pricing is opaque and public reviews are scarce.
SecurityHQ and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
SecurityHQ includes incident response.
Telefónica Tech
Telecom-backed MDR with 11 SOCs providing genuine follow-the-sun coverage, especially strong in Spain and Latin America. Configurable response model and affordable SMB tier are differentiators. Trade-offs: almost no public performance data, minimal community reviews outside home markets, primary reliance on CrowdStrike for EDR, and the parent company's own 2025 breach raises uncomfortable questions.
Telefónica Tech and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Telefónica Tech includes incident response.
Truesec
Largest Nordic SOC with deep IR background (120,000+ hours, vendor-stated). MDR Black tier covers IR costs for breaches on monitored devices. Strong fit for Nordic enterprises wanting local expertise. Limited US presence and zero independent reviews make it hard to evaluate for North American buyers.
Truesec and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Truesec covers 5 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
TrustNet GhostWatch
TrustNet GhostWatch is strongest where managed security and compliance need to move together. The trade-off is that public materials describe broad managed security more clearly than deep endpoint MDR, so response authority, EDR coverage and SLA terms need written confirmation.
TrustNet GhostWatch and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
TrustNet GhostWatch covers 2 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity.
Sygnia
The tightest MDR-to-IR integration available: same platform, same 8-person team, no handoff, no separate retainer. Genuine OT/ICS coverage. Trade-offs: zero public reviews, no published detection metrics, opaque pricing and recent CEO turnover.
Sygnia and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Sygnia covers 5 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
Cyberleaf
Cyberleaf fits buyers that want a U.S.-based SOC to operate across endpoint, cloud, identity, network and SaaS signals while supporting compliance requirements. The trade-offs are custom pricing, limited independent review signal, no public MDR-specific SLA table and sales-order details that determine what response and threat-hunting work is included.
Cyberleaf and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Cyberleaf covers 5 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity — broader coverage.
DOT Security
DOT Security is a pragmatic fit for smaller organizations that want managed cybersecurity help around endpoint MDR, SOC coverage, compliance and vCISO guidance. The trade-offs are custom pricing, limited independent MDR validation, no public response-action matrix and a broader MSSP scope that buyers need to separate from the MDR component.
DOT Security and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
DOT Security covers 1 surfaces vs. 3 for Ensign InfoSecurity.
Total Assure
Total Assure is strongest for SMB and regulated mid-market buyers that want a practical SOC team, not a large enterprise MDR program. Its public materials do a good job describing containment actions and onboarding. The main trade-offs are missing public pricing, thin independent reviews and limited contractual detail around SLA, warranty and third-party tool costs.
Total Assure and Ensign InfoSecurity are both Services firms and both work with your existing tools.
Total Assure is strongest for SMB and regulated mid-market buyers that want a practical SOC team, not a large enterprise MDR program. Its public materials do a good job describing containment actions and onboarding. The main trade-offs are missing public pricing, thin independent reviews and limited contractual detail around SLA, warranty and third-party tool costs.
›› Different approach
72 providers that take a different approach to MDR.
Cyderes
Technology-agnostic MDR built on Google Chronicle with deep identity security integrations and three delivery models (client-managed through fully managed). Trade-off: opaque pricing, almost no public reviews, and a complex corporate history from multiple mergers.
Cyderes and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Expel
API-first, vendor-agnostic MDR with 160+ integrations and full transparency into every SOC action via Workbench. Ideal for tech-forward organizations that want to keep their existing security tools and add a managed detection layer. Trade-off: threat hunting and incident response are add-ons, not included in base pricing, and no breach warranty.
Expel and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Expel is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Kudelski Security
Technology-agnostic MDR with strong analyst recognition (Gartner 8 years, Forrester, Bloor) and one of the few dedicated OT/ICS MDR offerings on the market. Swiss parent company adds stability. The trade-off: almost no community validation, no public pricing, and detection metrics that haven't been independently tested.
Kudelski Security and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Arctic Wolf
The Concierge Security Team model is Arctic Wolf's core differentiator: a named team that knows your environment and provides proactive security reviews. Technology-agnostic design avoids vendor lock-in, and the $3M warranty is the industry's largest. The trade-off is limited data transparency, guided (not hands-on) remediation, no published detection benchmarks, and a 71% false alarm rate by their own reporting.
Arctic Wolf and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
BlueVoyant
The strongest Microsoft Sentinel MDR option for organizations that want their detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own environment. No proprietary agent, no data lock-in, well-funded ($700M+), and credible founding team. Trade-off: narrow integration breadth outside the Microsoft and Splunk ecosystems, no published response SLAs, and very limited public reviews to validate performance claims.
BlueVoyant and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
CyberCX
Regional ANZ leader with 9 CREST-accredited SOCs, ~1,400 security professionals, and Microsoft Advanced Specializations. Best suited for ANZ organizations already invested in or moving to the Microsoft security ecosystem. The trade-off: deep Microsoft expertise and strong regional presence vs. no autonomous response capability, no published metrics, and Accenture integration uncertainty.
CyberCX and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
CyberMaxx
Healthcare-focused MDR with a Zero-Latency Response model and 24x7x365 threat responders. Technology-agnostic, works with existing CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Microsoft Defender. Three acquisitions in two years show growth ambition. Trade-offs: no published detection metrics, incident response and threat hunting are separate costs, and very limited independent community validation.
CyberMaxx and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
CyberOne
CyberOne is a credible UK Microsoft-stack specialist with CREST, NCSC, and Microsoft Verified MXDR credentials that matter for regulated UK buyers. Data stays in your own tenant, and the tiered pricing makes the service accessible to mid-market organisations. Trade-offs are meaningful: no peer reviews, no published detection metrics, no IR inclusion, and no coverage outside the Microsoft ecosystem.
CyberOne and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
CyberOne is a Microsoft-ecosystem while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
e2e-assure
UK-focused MDR with SC-cleared analysts and deep Microsoft expertise, purpose-built for critical infrastructure and government sectors. Automated containment (endpoint isolation, account disabling) triggers on critical threats, with analyst investigation within one hour. Trade-offs: remediation beyond containment is guided (customer executes), incident response is a separate partner-delivered service, detection metrics are tracked internally but not published, and pricing minimums are not disclosed.
e2e-assure and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Ontinue
Microsoft-native MXDR with 99.5% AI-automated incident resolution and Teams-based collaboration. Data stays in your own Sentinel instance, giving full portability if you leave. Microsoft-only, not suitable for multi-vendor stacks.
Ontinue and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Ontinue is a Microsoft-ecosystem while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
PAGO Networks
APAC-focused MDR with active remediation, multi-vendor EDR/XDR support via Stellar Cyber, dark web intelligence via StealthMole, and Korean/Southeast Asian language support across 8 countries. 400+ customers and 99% claimed retention rate. Trade-offs: no SOC presence outside APAC, no published detection metrics, no MITRE participation, and very limited English-language materials.
PAGO Networks and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Proficio
The core differentiator is SIEM flexibility: Proficio works with your existing SIEM or hosts one for you, which avoids the rip-and-replace problem. They publish detection metrics, which is more transparent than most providers this size. Trade-off: automated response costs extra, peer reviews are scarce, and the small team may not suit large enterprises.
Proficio and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Proficio is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Ackcent Cybersecurity
Gartner-recognized European boutique MDR with native Spanish support and bring-your-own-EDR flexibility. Good fit if you want a smaller, relationship-driven provider in the Iberian or LATAM markets. Trade-off: almost nothing is publicly documented, so due diligence relies heavily on direct engagement.
Ackcent Cybersecurity and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Ackcent Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Avertium
Technology-agnostic MDR with deep Microsoft, LogRhythm, and SentinelOne expertise. Compliance consulting and threat hunting are included in the base service. Co-managed guided response model, not autonomous remediation. Best for mid-market buyers already on one of these platforms who want relationship-driven service with input on response decisions. Trade-off: no published detection metrics, no breach warranty, DFIR is a separate engagement, and limited third-party validation compared to larger MDR providers.
Avertium and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Binary Defense
Binary Defense's core differentiator is proactive threat hunting with an attacker's mindset, consistently earning the highest Forrester scores in that category. The open XDR approach works with your existing tools and emphasizes data portability. The trade-off is US-only SOC operations, no published detection metrics, and some reports of declining service quality as the company scales.
Binary Defense and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Bridewell
Strong choice for UK/EU Critical National Infrastructure needing Microsoft-native MDR with NCSC/CREST credentials and OT/ICS expertise. Trade-offs: Microsoft platform dependency, limited pricing transparency, no breach warranty, no published detection metrics, and integration uncertainty following I-Tracing merger.
Bridewell and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Bridewell is a Microsoft-ecosystem while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Critical Start
Technology-agnostic MDR with TBR deterministic alert auto-resolution, 100+ integrations, OT/ICS support and two-person response validation. Participated in MITRE Engenuity managed services evaluation (2022 Round 1 only, not 2024 Round 2). Trade-off is fully opaque pricing, enterprise focus, no breach warranty and no Slack integration.
Critical Start and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Critical Start is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR that combines an agentic platform with a team of security experts with IR and threat hunting experience in a follow the sun model across the globe. Best suited for organizations with modern tech stack.
Daylight Security and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
DeepSeas
Technology-agnostic MDR with OT/ICS coverage, which is rare in this market. Ideal for mid-market and enterprise buyers with attack surfaces spanning IT, cloud, and operational technology. Trade-off: no in-house incident response (uses external DFIR partners) and zero pricing transparency.
DeepSeas and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Deepwatch
SIEM-centric, vendor-agnostic MDR with patented DRS engine (98% FP reduction claim), dedicated Squad team per customer, and deep Splunk/Chronicle/Sentinel/Securonix expertise. Organizational instability (CEO change, 42% headcount cut, negative employee reviews) warrants explicit due diligence on service continuity.
Deepwatch and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Deepwatch is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
eSentire
eSentire excels at active, hands-on response and publicly reports 15-minute containment. The multi-signal Atlas XDR platform and dedicated threat hunters make it a strong choice for organizations that want their MDR provider to take direct action across endpoint, network, cloud, and identity surfaces.
eSentire and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
eSentire is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Foresite Cybersecurity*AI-native SOC. Uses autonomous AI analysts for most triage and investigation, with human oversight.
Google Cloud SecOps specialist with deep Chronicle SIEM and compliance automation expertise. Best for mid-market GCP customers needing CMMC/HIPAA/PCI alignment with managed detection. Trade-offs: human-in-the-loop response slows containment vs. autonomous platforms, high upfront deployment costs ($25K-$100K), single SOC site in Kansas with no geographic redundancy, and limited public documentation of specific response actions.
Foresite Cybersecurity and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Foresite Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Intezer*AI-native SOC. Uses autonomous AI analysts for most triage and investigation, with human oversight.
AI-first approach to SOC operations delivers sub-minute triage across all alerts. Genetic malware analysis adds code-lineage context that signature-based detection misses. Per-endpoint pricing keeps costs predictable as alert volume grows. The trade-off: escalated alerts go to your team (not Intezer), so you need internal SOC staff or the CarbonHelix partnership.
Intezer and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Intezer is a AI-native MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Lumifi
PE-backed MDR roll-up with healthcare specialization, ex-military SOC personnel, and a technology-agnostic approach. ShieldVision provides 1,000+ playbooks for automation. The core trade-offs: no published detection metrics, no independent analyst recognition, zero pricing transparency, a 2.9/5 Glassdoor employee rating, and integration risk from absorbing three companies in just over a year. IR and OT/ICS are separate add-ons.
Lumifi and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Quorum Cyber
The strongest Microsoft-native MDR option with a tiered model spanning SMB to enterprise, backed by CREST accreditation, Gartner recognition, and Microsoft MSSP of the Year. Data stays in your own Azure tenant. Trade-off: Microsoft-only (no third-party EDR/SIEM support), no published detection metrics or response SLAs, and very limited independent reviews.
Quorum Cyber and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Rapid7
Full SIEM data access with managed MDR, analyst pod model for environment familiarity, and Active Response via Velociraptor. Trade-off: requires 80%+ Insight Agent coverage (platform lock-in), 500-asset minimum, and the company is navigating a challenging period with declining revenue guidance and activist investor pressure.
Rapid7 and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
Rapid7 uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Recon InfoSec
Recon InfoSec is a strong fit for buyers who want managed security operations with broad integrations, direct analyst access, proactive hunting, canaries, SIEM/SOAR and included incident response. The trade-offs are custom pricing, limited public third-party validation, no published contractual SLA table and operational details that need buyer confirmation.
Recon InfoSec and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Red Canary
Vendor-agnostic MDR with 9 EDR platform integrations and detection-as-code methodology, the broadest EDR support in the MDR market with strong analyst validation (Forrester Leader, G2 #1 satisfaction). Post-Zscaler acquisition: integrations maintained and product quality intact, but elevated customer churn and declining mindshare (4.2% to 2.9%) suggest some buyers are reconsidering.
Red Canary and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Red Canary is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
SECUINFRA
Fits German and EU buyers that put data sovereignty first and want a partner that will work inside their own SIEM. Buyers outside DACH or those that need transparent SLAs and warranties will find more options in the larger pure-play field.
SECUINFRA and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Six Degrees
Six Degrees MDR is strongest for UK organisations that want Microsoft-centred MDR delivered from a UK-onshore CSOC. The trade-offs are custom pricing, tier boundaries between MDA, MDR and MXDR, and limited public detail on exact response actions.
Six Degrees and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Six Degrees is a Microsoft-ecosystem while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Smarttech247
Technology-agnostic MDR that works with your existing SIEM and EDR, with 100% MDR client retention in FY2024 and Gartner Market Guide recognition two years running. Publicly traded on AIM, giving buyers financial transparency rare among smaller MDR providers. The trade-off: tiny review footprint (13 Gartner reviews, zero on G2 or PeerSpot), opaque pricing, no MITRE validation, no breach warranty, and a ~160-person company competing against firms 10x its size.
Smarttech247 and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Smarttech247 is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Socura
UK-only MDR with CREST-accredited SOC, automated containment via SOAR, and technology-agnostic approach. 100% customer retention and 96% autonomous incident handling (vendor-reported) suggest strong operational execution. Trade-offs: very small company, no published detection metrics, UK-only SOC, and incident response via external partners.
Socura and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Socura is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
TENEX.AI*AI-native SOC. Uses autonomous AI analysts for most triage and investigation, with human oversight.
TENEX.AI fits buyers that want an AI-native MDR model with human analyst oversight and are already close to Google, Microsoft or AWS security operations tooling. The main diligence gaps are billing terms, SLA terms, response approval defaults and independent customer validation.
TENEX.AI and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
TENEX.AI is a AI-native MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
UnderDefense
Works on top of your existing stack and keeps data in your infrastructure. Transparent $11/device starting price, 30-day onboarding, detection rules in portable Sigma format. The trade-off is a smaller company with no independent metric validation and almost no community visibility.
UnderDefense and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
UnderDefense is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Barracuda Networks
Purpose-built for the MSP channel with multi-tenant management, SentinelOne-powered endpoint security, and a 24/7 global SOC. Natural fit for MSPs serving SMB clients who need turnkey XDR. Less proven for direct enterprise buyers. Detection claims lack independent validation and security logs are not downloadable.
Barracuda Networks and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
Barracuda Networks is a MSP-channel while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Gradient Cyber
Mid-market specialist that owns its platform, SOC, and analyst team. 99% false positive elimination and 10:1 analyst ratio (both vendor-published) prioritize signal quality over noise. Active response capability includes endpoint isolation, process termination, quarantine, and rollback through integrated EDR agents, with response authority configurable per pre-agreed policies. Also covers maritime OT environments. Limited community feedback and no published detection speed metrics make independent validation difficult.
Gradient Cyber and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
Gradient Cyber is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
SonicWall SonicSentry MDR*Sold through managed service provider (MSP) partners, not directly to end customers.
SonicSentry MDR is strongest for MSPs that want SonicWall-led managed security services with CrowdStrike endpoint coverage and optional cloud or network MDR. The trade-offs are limited public SLA detail, no public price list, newer MDR review volume and scope that must be checked module by module.
SonicWall SonicSentry MDR and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
SonicWall SonicSentry MDR is a MSP-channel while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
WatchGuard*Sold through managed service provider (MSP) partners, not directly to end customers.
WatchGuard MDR is strongest for MSPs that already standardize on WatchGuard or want a managed SOC option they can sell across smaller customers. Open MDR broadens the fit by supporting selected third-party tools, but buyers still need to check package scope, license dependencies and the lack of public SLA terms.
WatchGuard and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
WatchGuard is a MSP-channel while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
AirMDR*AI-native SOC. Uses autonomous AI analysts for most triage and investigation, with human oversight.
AI-native architecture with 240+ integrations (vendor-claimed) and aggressive trial terms. Best for cost-conscious SMBs willing to adopt early-stage AI automation. The trade-off is vendor maturity, zero public reviews and opaque pricing.
AirMDR and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
AirMDR is a AI-native MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Armor
Armor's niche is regulated cloud workloads where Microsoft Sentinel is already deployed. Compliance consulting in HIPAA, PCI, and HITRUST is a genuine differentiator. The trade-off: you are locked into both the Trend Micro agent and the Microsoft security stack, and there is almost no independent review data to validate the service quality.
Armor and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
Armor uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Bitdefender MDR
MITRE-validated detection quality on a single-vendor GravityZone platform with 3 global SOCs and competitive per-endpoint pricing. The trade-off is full vendor lock-in to GravityZone, no third-party EDR support, and XDR sensor licenses that add cost if you need coverage beyond endpoints.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, Bitdefender MDR — both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Bitdefender MDR uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
CrowdStrike
Top-tier detection speed and active remediation depth backed by MITRE-validated metrics, CrowdStrike threat intelligence, and a breach warranty up to $2M. Premium pricing reflects premium capability.
CrowdStrike and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
CrowdStrike uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Cyberoo
Technology-agnostic MDR from the only Italian Gartner Representative Vendor, built for European mid-market. 24/7 I-SOC from Italy with expanding regional presence. Threat hunting and IR included in base pricing. Publicly traded with strong financials (~39% EBITDA margin, FY2024). Trade-off: small team (~105 employees), no published detection metrics, opaque pricing, and limited presence outside Europe.
Cyberoo and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Cyrebro
Vendor-neutral MDR with its own detection engine and SOAR, fast deployment, and reported low false positive rates. Trade-off: single-region SOC, limited brand recognition, and support quality concerns noted in reviews.
Cyrebro and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Darktrace
AI-powered threat detection through Self-Learning AI that adapts to each environment's behavioral patterns, combined with Antigena autonomous response that contains threats in seconds. Broad attack surface coverage and technology-agnostic architecture suit complex environments. Trade-offs: premium pricing, high false positive tuning burden, steep learning curve, and the MDR service is new (June 2024) with limited independent reviews.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, Darktrace — both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
Darktrace uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
DefenseStorm
DefenseStorm is a strong vertical MDR candidate for U.S. banks and credit unions because it combines 24/7 banking SOC support, GRID Active detection, EDR integrations and examiner-aligned evidence. The trade-offs are a narrow vertical fit, custom pricing, limited public detail on contractual SLAs, and a collaborative response model where the customer makes final decisions.
DefenseStorm and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
DirectDefense
Technology-agnostic MDR with SOAR-driven triage, offensive security DNA, and OT/ICS partnerships that most MDR providers lack. IR retainer is bundled, not an add-on. Trade-offs: requires your own SIEM, no published detection metrics, zero public reviews, and response is guided (they advise, you act). Best for mid-market buyers already invested in tools who want managed operations, not a rip-and-replace.
DirectDefense and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
DirectDefense is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
ESET
Low 25-device minimum makes MDR accessible to small businesses, backed by 30+ years of ESET threat research. Best fit for organizations willing to adopt or already using the ESET PROTECT ecosystem. The trade-off is full platform lock-in and detection metrics that haven't been independently validated to the same standard as CrowdStrike or Palo Alto.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, ESET — both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
ESET uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Eye Security
European MDR with intelligence-agency pedigree and an optional cyber insurance bundle through Eye Underwriting. Runs on Microsoft Defender and Sentinel. Trade-offs: no published detection benchmarks, limited public reviews and Europe-only coverage.
Eye Security and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
Eye Security is a Microsoft-ecosystem while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
LMNTRIX
All-inclusive pricing and integrated deception technology are the main reasons to evaluate LMNTRIX. Performance claims are aggressive but unvalidated. Best for cost-conscious mid-market buyers willing to trade brand-name safety for lower cost and a smaller vendor.
LMNTRIX and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
LMNTRIX uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
N-able*Sold through managed service provider (MSP) partners, not directly to end customers.
Unified security operations platform combining XDR, SIEM, SOAR, and UEBA with vendor-agnostic MDR and $500K breach warranty. Best for MSPs wanting to consolidate tools. Trade-off: pricing is higher than competitors, the 70% automation claim lacks independent validation, and the N-able acquisition creates integration uncertainty.
N-able and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
N-able is a MSP-channel while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
OpenText
Sensible fit for smaller IT teams that want OpenText's threat intelligence and a 24/7 SOC layered on top of their current tools, as long as they accept a co-managed model where their team still executes containment.
OpenText and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
OpenText is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Palo Alto Networks
Enterprise MDR backed by Palo Alto Networks threat intelligence infrastructure (500B events/day, 200+ Unit 42 analysts) and Frost & Sullivan Leader recognition. Best for existing Palo Alto ecosystem customers wanting native, deeply integrated MDR. MSIAM 2.0 adds third-party EDR support and breach response guarantee. Significant prerequisite costs (Cortex XDR + Data Lake) and platform lock-in are the main trade-offs.
Palo Alto Networks and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
Palo Alto Networks uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Pondurance
Affordable, technology-agnostic MDR for US mid-market buyers in regulated industries, with a risk-based detection approach and $2M breach warranty. Trade-off: very small team (~124 employees), almost no independent reviews to validate claims, Glassdoor scores suggest internal challenges, and overnight coverage is on-call rather than follow-the-sun.
Pondurance and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
Pondurance is a Pure-play MDR while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
Kaseya MDR
Kaseya MDR is strongest for MSPs that want RocketCyber-style managed SOC coverage tied into Kaseya, Datto and PSA workflows. The trade-offs are Kaseya commercial lock-in, custom pricing, limited public SLA data and a current branding transition from RocketCyber to Kaseya MDR that buyers should pin down in writing.
Kaseya MDR and Ensign InfoSecurity are both work with your existing tools and both target Mid-market organizations.
Kaseya MDR is a MSP-channel while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
SentinelOne
Platform-native MDR for SentinelOne customers with $1M breach warranty, FedRAMP High, and Purple AI Athena agentic workflows. MITRE Managed Services: 100% detection with best signal-to-noise ratio. Key trade-off: strong platform technology but MDR service layer gets consistently lower marks than the platform itself, with false positive tuning and support quality as persistent concerns.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, SentinelOne — both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
SentinelOne uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Sophos
Platform vendor with unusually broad third-party integration support (350+ tools), all-in pricing on MDR Complete with full IR and $1M breach warranty, and #1 G2 MDR ranking for 14 consecutive quarters. Key trade-off: requires Sophos agent for full capabilities, dashboard-only data access (no raw query), and the Secureworks acquisition creates product roadmap uncertainty.
Sophos and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
Sophos uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Trend Micro
Platform-native MDR backed by 20-year Gartner Leader status, 100% MITRE detection, and 450 threat researchers. Best for mid-market and enterprise Trend customers wanting unified visibility across all attack surfaces. Credit-based licensing and extensive integrations provide flexibility. Trade-off: platform lock-in, pooled analysts, no published response time metrics, and no breach warranty.
Trend Micro and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
Trend Micro uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
GoSecure
Bundles endpoint, network, email, and AD identity detection in a single platform with published per-endpoint pricing. DHS CDM APL listing adds government credibility. Trade-off: almost no public reviews exist, and the platform-native architecture requires the Titan EDR agent despite 'open XDR' positioning.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, GoSecure — both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
GoSecure uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
NetWitness
NetWitness MDR fits best when the buyer's detection stack is NetWitness Platform XDR or the buyer wants a NetWitness and Lumifi model for IT/OT monitoring. The trade-off is opacity: public materials do not publish pricing, containment authority, MDR-specific staffing, response SLAs or warranty terms.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, NetWitness — both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
NetWitness uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
ThreatSpike
ThreatSpike is compelling if the buyer wants consolidation: MDR, managed IT, 24/7 SOC, unlimited incident response and offensive testing under one fixed per-user subscription. The trade-off is that it behaves more like an IT-and-security operating model replacement than a conventional MDR overlay, with limited public detail on contractual SLAs, raw data access and exit portability.
ThreatSpike and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
ThreatSpike uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
WithSecure
European-focused MDR for organizations prioritizing data sovereignty. Forrester gave highest scores in Innovation, Data Sovereignty, and Service Localization. NCSC CIR Level 1 is held by only 9 IR teams globally. Included IR at mid-market pricing is a concrete reason to evaluate it.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, WithSecure — both target Mid-market and Enterprise organizations.
WithSecure uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Cynet
Best fit for SMB/mid-market teams wanting an all-in-one security platform with transparent pricing ($7-10/endpoint/month) and MDR included. Trade-off is full platform lock-in (must replace existing EDR), small company scale, and absence from Gartner MQ/Forrester Wave.
Cynet and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
Cynet uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Huntress
The most recommended MDR on r/msp for SMB environments. Human-led SOC with <1% false positive rate and 8-minute MTTR, follow-the-sun coverage, and a multi-product platform that consolidates EDR, identity, SIEM, and training under one vendor.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, Huntress — both target Mid-market organizations.
Huntress uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Stoik
Stoik removes the friction of buying cyber insurance and MDR separately by bundling both for European SMEs. CrowdStrike Falcon provides detection, CERT-Stoik handles incident response and insurance covers financial exposure up to 7.5M EUR (10M EUR in Belgium). The trade-off: endpoint-only coverage, no published detection benchmarks, broker-only sales channel and unclear boundary between automated and human response.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, Stoik — both work with your existing tools.
Stoik is a Cyber insurer while Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm.
VikingCloud
Compliance-first provider with 35-year PCI heritage and the world's largest QSA practice (100+ assessors). Best suited for regulated verticals where compliance and security monitoring need to be tightly integrated under one vendor. The trade-off: MDR capabilities are poorly documented publicly, no validated detection metrics, proprietary platform lock-in, and the 4M customer figure is mostly compliance clients rather than MDR buyers.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, VikingCloud — both target Mid-market organizations.
VikingCloud uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
At-Bay Stance MDR
At-Bay Stance MDR is most interesting where cyber insurance and MDR are evaluated together: it offers full remediation, cross-surface MXDR coverage and potential insurance enhancements. The trade-offs are custom pricing, limited independent review signal, no public contractual SLA table, and operational details like SOC location and response playbooks that need buyer confirmation.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, At-Bay Stance MDR — both target Mid-market organizations.
At-Bay Stance MDR uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Blackpoint Cyber
MSP-channel MDR with autonomous SOC response (self-reported 7-16 min MTTR) and patented network visualization. Trade-offs: MSP-only sales model, limited portal transparency, no approval controls, no MITRE validation.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, Blackpoint Cyber — both target Mid-market organizations.
Blackpoint Cyber uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
ConnectWise*Sold through managed service provider (MSP) partners, not directly to end customers.
Good fit for MSPs already running ConnectWise PSA and RMM who want integrated MDR with multi-EDR flexibility. The trade-off is ecosystem lock-in, limited independent validation, and an immature SIEM layer.
ConnectWise and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
ConnectWise uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Field Effect
MITRE-validated detection (11-min MTTD) with published per-user pricing and fast onboarding. Ex-CSE intelligence founders. Strong fit for SMBs and MSPs wanting affordable, independently validated MDR.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, Field Effect — both target Mid-market organizations.
Field Effect uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
ThreatDown
One of the most affordable MDR options with fully published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). Fast deployment, MSP-first channel approach, and ransomware rollback/three-level isolation are genuine differentiators. Best fit for SMBs wanting endpoint MDR without enterprise complexity or cost.
Like Ensign InfoSecurity, ThreatDown — both target Mid-market organizations.
ThreatDown uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).
Todyl
SASE, EDR, SIEM, MXDR, SOAR, and GRC in a single agent with a dedicated DRAM per customer. Built for MSPs willing to commit to one vendor in exchange for eliminating tool sprawl. Trade-off: total platform lock-in and limited independent validation.
Todyl and Ensign InfoSecurity are both target Mid-market organizations and both cover 3 of the same surfaces.
Todyl uses its own platform (Ensign InfoSecurity integrates with your tools).