Cynet Cynet 360 AutoXDR

Cynet 360 AutoXDR is an all-in-one platform combining XDR, response automation, and 24/7 MDR in a single native offering designed for SMB to mid-market organizations with small security teams.

Key Facts:

• Founded 2015 in Israel with global operations (private company)
• Platform: Cynet 360 AutoXDR
• All-in-one: XDR + Response Automation + 24/7 MDR (single offering)
• Autonomous breach protection
• Gartner Peer Insights: Strong Performer in XDR "Voice of the Customer" 2025
• MITRE ATT&CK 2024: Maximum protection scores
• Target: SMB to mid-market (small security teams)
• Native combination vs bolt-on services

Pricing Transparency

• Pricing not publicly disclosed (custom quotes required)
• All-in-one model pricing unclear
• Difficult to compare vs point solutions
• No public pricing benchmarks
• Requires sales engagement for cost information

Less Enterprise Focus

• SMB to mid-market focus (not enterprise optimized)
• May lack enterprise-scale features
• Limited enterprise customer references
• Small security team orientation may not suit large SOCs
• Enterprise complexity may exceed platform design

Israeli Origin Concerns

• Israeli headquarters may concern some buyers
• Geopolitical perception issues
• Some enterprises prefer US/Western European vendors
• Data sovereignty considerations
• Regional bias in some markets

Platform Lock-In

• Requires Cynet 360 platform commitment
• All-in-one approach means less flexibility
• Not technology-agnostic (native platform)
• May require migration from existing tools
• Single vendor dependency

Limited Public Information

• Performance metrics not publicly disclosed
• No public SLA documentation
• Customer case studies limited
• Onboarding timelines unclear
• Implementation complexity not detailed

Service Model

• No dedicated analyst (shared SOC model)
• No quarterly reviews in standard offering
• Automated workflows may miss edge cases
• Balance between automation and human expertise unclear

Geographic Coverage Questions

• Global operations claimed but specifics unclear
• Regional SOC locations not disclosed
• Service quality outside primary markets uncertain
• Data residency options require sales contact

Gartner and MITRE Validated (2025)

Gartner Peer Insights Recognition:

"Cynet named Strong Performer in XDR Voice of the Customer 2025 on Gartner Peer Insights, validating customer satisfaction and platform effectiveness through peer-reviewed recognition."

• Gartner Peer Insights, 2025

MITRE ATT&CK Validation:

"Maximum protection scores in MITRE ATT&CK 2024 evaluation, providing independent validation of detection capabilities and threat coverage across framework-based testing."

• MITRE ATT&CK evaluation, 2024

All-in-One Platform:

"Cynet 360 AutoXDR combines XDR, response automation, and 24/7 MDR in single native offering, reducing vendor and tool sprawl with unified platform approach for small security teams."

• Cynet platform documentation, 2025

Sensor Fusion Technology:

"Sensor Fusion Technology provides unified detection across memory-based execution monitoring, network traffic behavior analysis, user account activity tracking, and file access monitoring for comprehensive threat visibility."

• Cynet Sensor Fusion documentation, 2025

Autonomous Capabilities:

"Automated investigation and remediation with advanced SOAR and XDR capabilities enable zero human intervention workflows for autonomous breach protection and self-healing security posture."

• Cynet automation documentation, 2025

Target Market:

"Designed for SMB to mid-market organizations with small security teams, providing all-in-one simplicity and automated response to reduce analyst burden and security complexity."

• Cynet market positioning, 2025

Note on Reviews: Gartner Peer Insights Strong Performer status and MITRE ATT&CK maximum scores provide third-party validation. All-in-one approach appeals to small security teams but creates platform lock-in. Potential customers should validate fit for organization size, understand automation limitations, clarify pricing vs point solutions, and assess Israeli origin implications for their requirements.