Microsoft Sentinel integration considerations
- Microsoft Sentinel's consumption-based pricing means MDR providers should help optimize data ingestion costs.
- Ask whether the provider deploys their own analytics rules or uses your existing Sentinel workspace as-is.
- Verify the provider supports Sentinel's SOAR (Logic Apps) capabilities for automated response.
- Check if the provider can manage multi-tenant Sentinel workspaces if you operate across Azure tenants.
Keeping your current EDR or adopting the provider’s own platform is the first decision here. MDR vs EDR explains how the two models differ and when each one makes sense.
63 providers
AirMDR*
AI-native architecture with 240+ integrations (vendor-claimed) and aggressive trial terms. Best for cost-conscious SMBs willing to adopt early-stage AI automation. The trade-off is vendor maturity, zero public reviews and opaque pricing.
Armor
Armor's niche is regulated cloud workloads where Microsoft Sentinel is already deployed. Compliance consulting in HIPAA, PCI, and HITRUST is a genuine differentiator. The trade-off: you are locked into both the Trend Micro agent and the Microsoft security stack, and there is almost no independent review data to validate the service quality.
Avertium
Technology-agnostic MDR with deep Microsoft, LogRhythm, and SentinelOne expertise. Compliance consulting and threat hunting are included in the base service. Co-managed guided response model, not autonomous remediation. Best for mid-market buyers already on one of these platforms who want relationship-driven service with input on response decisions. Trade-off: no published detection metrics, no breach warranty, DFIR is a separate engagement, and limited third-party validation compared to larger MDR providers.
Binary Defense
Binary Defense's core differentiator is proactive threat hunting with an attacker's mindset, consistently earning the highest Forrester scores in that category. The open XDR approach works with your existing tools and emphasizes data portability. The trade-off is US-only SOC operations, no published detection metrics, and some reports of declining service quality as the company scales.
Bitdefender MDR
MITRE-validated detection quality on a single-vendor GravityZone platform with 3 global SOCs and competitive per-endpoint pricing. The trade-off is full vendor lock-in to GravityZone, no third-party EDR support, and XDR sensor licenses that add cost if you need coverage beyond endpoints.
BlueVoyant
The strongest Microsoft Sentinel MDR option for organizations that want their detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own environment. No proprietary agent, no data lock-in, well-funded ($700M+), and credible founding team. Trade-off: narrow integration breadth outside the Microsoft and Splunk ecosystems, no published response SLAs, and very limited public reviews to validate performance claims.
Bridewell
Strong choice for UK/EU Critical National Infrastructure needing Microsoft-native MDR with NCSC/CREST credentials and OT/ICS expertise. Trade-offs: Microsoft platform dependency, limited pricing transparency, no breach warranty, no published detection metrics, and integration uncertainty following I-Tracing merger.
Capgemini*
Capgemini is strongest when MDR is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: Managed SOC, SOC transformation, DFIR, threat hunting, vulnerability management and Microsoft Sentinel operations. The main diligence items are contractual response authority, log retention, included hunt cadence, service credits, MTTD/MTTR reporting, Microsoft licensing and offboarding rights.
Critical Start
Technology-agnostic MDR with TBR deterministic alert auto-resolution, 100+ integrations, OT/ICS support and two-person response validation. Participated in MITRE Engenuity managed services evaluation (2022 Round 1 only, not 2024 Round 2). Trade-off is fully opaque pricing, enterprise focus, no breach warranty and no Slack integration.
CyberCX
Regional ANZ leader with 9 CREST-accredited SOCs, ~1,400 security professionals, and Microsoft Advanced Specializations. Best suited for ANZ organizations already invested in or moving to the Microsoft security ecosystem. The trade-off: deep Microsoft expertise and strong regional presence vs. no autonomous response capability, no published metrics, and Accenture integration uncertainty.
CyberOne
CyberOne is a credible UK Microsoft-stack specialist with CREST, NCSC, and Microsoft Verified MXDR credentials that matter for regulated UK buyers. Data stays in your own tenant, and the tiered pricing makes the service accessible to mid-market organisations. Trade-offs are meaningful: no peer reviews, no published detection metrics, no IR inclusion, and no coverage outside the Microsoft ecosystem.
Cyderes
Technology-agnostic MDR built on Google Chronicle with deep identity security integrations and three delivery models (client-managed through fully managed). Trade-off: opaque pricing, almost no public reviews, and a complex corporate history from multiple mergers.
Darktrace
AI-powered threat detection through Self-Learning AI that adapts to each environment's behavioral patterns, combined with Antigena autonomous response that contains threats in seconds. Broad attack surface coverage and technology-agnostic architecture suit complex environments. Trade-offs: premium pricing, high false positive tuning burden, steep learning curve, and the MDR service is new (June 2024) with limited independent reviews.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR that combines an agentic platform with a team of security experts with IR and threat hunting experience in a follow the sun model across the globe. Best suited for organizations with modern tech stack.
DeepSeas
Technology-agnostic MDR with OT/ICS coverage, which is rare in this market. Ideal for mid-market and enterprise buyers with attack surfaces spanning IT, cloud, and operational technology. Trade-off: no in-house incident response (uses external DFIR partners) and zero pricing transparency.
Deepwatch
SIEM-centric, vendor-agnostic MDR with patented DRS engine (98% FP reduction claim), dedicated Squad team per customer, and deep Splunk/Chronicle/Sentinel/Securonix expertise. Organizational instability (CEO change, 42% headcount cut, negative employee reviews) warrants explicit due diligence on service continuity.
Defendable
Defendable MDR fits Nordic buyers that want Norwegian SOC monitoring, Microsoft Sentinel-friendly operations, proactive threat hunting and incident-response depth. The main diligence items are custom pricing, log retention cost, response authority and where MDR ends versus the incident-response retainer.
Devoteam*
Devoteam Cloud MDR is strongest for cloud-first organizations that want Sentinel-centered SIEM operations and managed cloud security from a large EMEA services firm. The main diligence items are Sentinel and cloud log costs, response authority, SOC delivery model, endpoint response coverage, contractual SLAs and offboarding rights.
DirectDefense
Technology-agnostic MDR with SOAR-driven triage, offensive security DNA, and OT/ICS partnerships that most MDR providers lack. IR retainer is bundled, not an add-on. Trade-offs: requires your own SIEM, no published detection metrics, zero public reviews, and response is guided (they advise, you act). Best for mid-market buyers already invested in tools who want managed operations, not a rip-and-replace.
e2e-assure
UK-focused MDR with SC-cleared analysts and deep Microsoft expertise, purpose-built for critical infrastructure and government sectors. Automated containment (endpoint isolation, account disabling) triggers on critical threats, with analyst investigation within one hour. Trade-offs: remediation beyond containment is guided (customer executes), incident response is a separate partner-delivered service, detection metrics are tracked internally but not published, and pricing minimums are not disclosed.
eSentire
eSentire excels at active, hands-on response and publicly reports 15-minute containment. The multi-signal Atlas XDR platform and dedicated threat hunters make it a strong choice for organizations that want their MDR provider to take direct action across endpoint, network, cloud, and identity surfaces.
ESET
Low 25-device minimum makes MDR accessible to small businesses, backed by 30+ years of ESET threat research. Best fit for organizations willing to adopt or already using the ESET PROTECT ecosystem. The trade-off is full platform lock-in and detection metrics that haven't been independently validated to the same standard as CrowdStrike or Palo Alto.
Eviden
Fits European and Middle East enterprise buyers that already work with Atos or want a multinational services firm running their MDR. Pure-play competitors will move faster on SMB and mid-market deals.
Expel
API-first, vendor-agnostic MDR with 160+ integrations and full transparency into every SOC action via Workbench. Ideal for tech-forward organizations that want to keep their existing security tools and add a managed detection layer. Trade-off: threat hunting and incident response are add-ons, not included in base pricing, and no breach warranty.
Eye Security
European MDR with intelligence-agency pedigree and an optional cyber insurance bundle through Eye Underwriting. Runs on Microsoft Defender and Sentinel. Trade-offs: no published detection benchmarks, limited public reviews and Europe-only coverage.
GoSecure
Bundles endpoint, network, email, and AD identity detection in a single platform with published per-endpoint pricing. DHS CDM APL listing adds government credibility. Trade-off: almost no public reviews exist, and the platform-native architecture requires the Titan EDR agent despite 'open XDR' positioning.
Hitachi Cyber
Reasonable fit for organizations already inside the Hitachi ecosystem or those that want one vendor covering IT and OT across multiple regions. Buyers shopping on transparent metrics or community reputation will find thinner public evidence than the major pure-play MDRs offer.
Innofactor MDRaaS
Innofactor MDRaaS fits Microsoft-heavy Nordic buyers that want Sentinel-based monitoring while keeping logs and incidents in their own Azure environment. The trade-offs are custom pricing, endpoint and network add-ons plus response authority that needs explicit contract language.
Integrity360
CREST-accredited European MDR with seven SOCs and a proprietary detection platform that works with the customer's existing tools. Backed by August Equity with an active acquisition strategy (nine acquisitions in four years). Trade-off: no published detection metrics, virtually zero community review presence, and North American coverage is limited to a January 2026 Canadian acquisition.
Intezer*
AI-first approach to SOC operations delivers sub-minute triage across all alerts. Genetic malware analysis adds code-lineage context that signature-based detection misses. Per-endpoint pricing keeps costs predictable as alert volume grows. The trade-off: escalated alerts go to your team (not Intezer), so you need internal SOC staff or the CarbonHelix partnership.
ITC Secure
ITC Secure fits buyers that want Microsoft-centered MXDR with Pulse portal visibility, service reporting and advisory depth from the same provider. The main diligence items are custom pricing, exact component inclusion, response authority and how much incident response is included versus sold separately.
Kroll
Kroll Responder's differentiator is depth of real-world IR experience: 3,000+ annual breach investigations feeding detection and response. This is a services firm with MDR, not an MDR vendor with services. Complete Response methodology, included $1M breach warranty, and direct escalation to IR/forensics teams set it apart. December 2025 CrowdStrike migration brings faster response but increases platform dependency.
Kudelski Security
Technology-agnostic MDR with strong analyst recognition (Gartner 8 years, Forrester, Bloor) and one of the few dedicated OT/ICS MDR offerings on the market. Swiss parent company adds stability. The trade-off: almost no community validation, no public pricing, and detection metrics that haven't been independently tested.
LevelBlue
The largest pure-play MSSP by revenue ($1B+) with the deepest compliance credentials in MDR (FedRAMP, PCI DSS QSA, StateRAMP) and SpiderLabs, a 1,000+ person offensive security team. Cybereason's 100% MITRE ATT&CK detection adds real substance. Trade-off: five acquisitions in two years created a fragmented portfolio of unintegrated platforms, and integration execution remains unproven.
LMNTRIX
All-inclusive pricing and integrated deception technology are the main reasons to evaluate LMNTRIX. Performance claims are aggressive but unvalidated. Best for cost-conscious mid-market buyers willing to trade brand-name safety for lower cost and a smaller vendor.
LRQA Nettitude
LRQA Nettitude is strongest where MDR is part of a wider assurance, testing and incident-response program. CREST SOC certification, broad CREST accreditations and current NCSC CIR assurance make it credible for regulated and UK buyers. The trade-off is a custom, scope-dependent service with limited public detail on pricing, response authority, SOC locations and measured detection performance.
Lumifi
PE-backed MDR roll-up with healthcare specialization, ex-military SOC personnel, and a technology-agnostic approach. ShieldVision provides 1,000+ playbooks for automation. The core trade-offs: no published detection metrics, no independent analyst recognition, zero pricing transparency, a 2.9/5 Glassdoor employee rating, and integration risk from absorbing three companies in just over a year. IR and OT/ICS are separate add-ons.
mnemonic
mnemonic MDR fits European buyers that want an Argus-based service with Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Wiz, network and OT-oriented coverage. The trade-off is commercial opacity, since public materials do not publish prices, fixed SLA terms, warranty terms or all standard containment actions.
NCC Group
Consultancy-backed MXDR with Fox-IT's 20+ year SOC heritage and embedded IR team. Best for European enterprise and government buyers running Sentinel or Splunk who want detection depth and IR capability in one provider. Forrester and IDC both recognize the technical quality. Trade-off: only two SIEMs supported, no public reviews from MDR customers, no breach warranty, and MDR is one of many NCC Group business lines.
Nomios
Nomios MDR fits European buyers that value EU data hosting, a visitable Dutch SOC and a choice between packaged Cortex XDR MDR and a custom service around existing tools. The trade-off is pricing and SLA opacity: tiers are public, but amounts, service-credit language and breach warranty terms are not.
NRI SecureTechnologies
Reasonable fit for organizations with Japan operations that want a Japanese-rooted SOC and a deep CrowdStrike-managed service. Buyers shopping on transparent metrics or community reviews will find thinner public evidence than pure-play Western MDRs offer.
NVISO
NVISO MDR fits European buyers that want a security-operations partner with MDR, CSIRT, threat hunting and advisory depth rather than a narrow endpoint-only service. The trade-off is commercial opacity, since pricing, fixed SLA terms, breach warranty and named containment actions are not published.
Obrela
Good fit for European/MENA buyers who need OT or maritime MDR and are comfortable with a Microsoft-centric stack. Gartner and Forrester recognize them, and they publish operational metrics most competitors keep private. Trade-off: zero public customer reviews, completely opaque pricing across four tiers, threat hunting as an upsell, and no SOC presence outside Europe/MENA.
Ontinue
Microsoft-native MXDR with 99.5% AI-automated incident resolution and Teams-based collaboration. Data stays in your own Sentinel instance, giving full portability if you leave. Microsoft-only, not suitable for multi-vendor stacks.
OpenText
Sensible fit for smaller IT teams that want OpenText's threat intelligence and a 24/7 SOC layered on top of their current tools, as long as they accept a co-managed model where their team still executes containment.
Orange Cyberdefense
European regulatory accreditations and geographic SOC coverage that few MDR providers can match. Broad service catalog from a single vendor. Trade-off: no published detection metrics, no MITRE participation, and zero practitioner reviews anywhere online.
Performanta
Performanta fits buyers that want Microsoft-centered MDR with Safe XDR, managed SOC and incident-response support from the same services firm. The main diligence items are custom pricing, whether Performanta manages the controls needed for direct remediation, non-Microsoft telemetry depth and what incident-response work is included.
Proficio
The core differentiator is SIEM flexibility: Proficio works with your existing SIEM or hosts one for you, which avoids the rip-and-replace problem. They publish detection metrics, which is more transparent than most providers this size. Trade-off: automated response costs extra, peer reviews are scarce, and the small team may not suit large enterprises.
Quorum Cyber
The strongest Microsoft-native MDR option with a tiered model spanning SMB to enterprise, backed by CREST accreditation, Gartner recognition, and Microsoft MSSP of the Year. Data stays in your own Azure tenant. Trade-off: Microsoft-only (no third-party EDR/SIEM support), no published detection metrics or response SLAs, and very limited independent reviews.
r-tec IT Security
r-tec MDR fits German buyers that need 24x7 detection, incident-response depth and a path to OT MDR. The trade-offs are custom pricing, tier-dependent service hours and response actions that should be turned into written authority before signing.
Rapid7
Full SIEM data access with managed MDR, analyst pod model for environment familiarity, and Active Response via Velociraptor. Trade-off: requires 80%+ Insight Agent coverage (platform lock-in), 500-asset minimum, and the company is navigating a challenging period with declining revenue guidance and activist investor pressure.
Red Canary
Vendor-agnostic MDR with 9 EDR platform integrations and detection-as-code methodology, the broadest EDR support in the MDR market with strong analyst validation (Forrester Leader, G2 #1 satisfaction). Post-Zscaler acquisition: integrations maintained and product quality intact, but elevated customer churn and declining mindshare (4.2% to 2.9%) suggest some buyers are reconsidering.
SECUINFRA
Fits German and EU buyers that put data sovereignty first and want a partner that will work inside their own SIEM. Buyers outside DACH or those that need transparent SLAs and warranties will find more options in the larger pure-play field.
Six Degrees
Six Degrees MDR is strongest for UK organisations that want Microsoft-centred MDR delivered from a UK-onshore CSOC. The trade-offs are custom pricing, tier boundaries between MDA, MDR and MXDR, and limited public detail on exact response actions.
Smarttech247
Technology-agnostic MDR that works with your existing SIEM and EDR, with 100% MDR client retention in FY2024 and Gartner Market Guide recognition two years running. Publicly traded on AIM, giving buyers financial transparency rare among smaller MDR providers. The trade-off: tiny review footprint (13 Gartner reviews, zero on G2 or PeerSpot), opaque pricing, no MITRE validation, no breach warranty, and a ~160-person company competing against firms 10x its size.
Sygnia
The tightest MDR-to-IR integration available: same platform, same 8-person team, no handoff, no separate retainer. Genuine OT/ICS coverage. Trade-offs: zero public reviews, no published detection metrics, opaque pricing and recent CEO turnover.
TENEX.AI*
TENEX.AI fits buyers that want an AI-native MDR model with human analyst oversight and are already close to Google, Microsoft or AWS security operations tooling. The main diligence gaps are billing terms, SLA terms, response approval defaults and independent customer validation.
ThreatDown
One of the most affordable MDR options with fully published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). Fast deployment, MSP-first channel approach, and ransomware rollback/three-level isolation are genuine differentiators. Best fit for SMBs wanting endpoint MDR without enterprise complexity or cost.
Trend Micro
Platform-native MDR backed by 20-year Gartner Leader status, 100% MITRE detection, and 450 threat researchers. Best for mid-market and enterprise Trend customers wanting unified visibility across all attack surfaces. Credit-based licensing and extensive integrations provide flexibility. Trade-off: platform lock-in, pooled analysts, no published response time metrics, and no breach warranty.
Truesec
Largest Nordic SOC with deep IR background (120,000+ hours, vendor-stated). MDR Black tier covers IR costs for breaches on monitored devices. Strong fit for Nordic enterprises wanting local expertise. Limited US presence and zero independent reviews make it hard to evaluate for North American buyers.
UnderDefense
Works on top of your existing stack and keeps data in your infrastructure. Transparent $11/device starting price, 30-day onboarding, detection rules in portable Sigma format. The trade-off is a smaller company with no independent metric validation and almost no community visibility.
Wirespeed*
Wirespeed is most interesting as an automated MDR layer for MSPs, lean security teams and Coalition-aligned insurance buyers. It can triage and act on alerts across existing tools rather than replacing the stack. The trade-offs are custom pricing, limited independent validation, no public SLA, no public breach warranty and an automation-heavy model that needs careful scoping.
WithSecure
European-focused MDR for organizations prioritizing data sovereignty. Forrester gave highest scores in Innovation, Data Sovereignty, and Service Localization. NCSC CIR Level 1 is held by only 9 IR teams globally. Included IR at mid-market pricing is a concrete reason to evaluate it.