SecurityHQ vs Tesorion
SecurityHQ and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. SecurityHQ targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. SecurityHQ includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
SecurityHQ and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. SecurityHQ targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. SecurityHQ includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Tesorion offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 3). SecurityHQ may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | SecurityHQTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | None listed | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | IBM QRadar | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤15 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, data volume and services required. Available through AWS Marketplace with private offers. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.. No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales.. Identity monitoring and SaaS coverage are scoped separately, which could increase costs significantly depending on your environment.. Multi-year contracts are typical in the MSSP market. Ask about early termination terms and auto-renewal clauses. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeMiddle EastNorth AmericaAPACAfrica | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyManufacturing | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Thin public review presence compared to larger MDR vendors. MITRE 2024 managed services evaluation showed strong detection with low alert noise. IDC MarketScape Leader for Middle East MDR in 2024 and 2025. Technology-agnostic approach appeals to customers with existing EDR investments, but no published pricing and few customer references make independent evaluation difficult. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001CREST | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | ISO 27001CREST SOC Accreditation | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2003 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by SIEM deployment and customer contract. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between SecurityHQ and Tesorion?
SecurityHQ is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: SecurityHQ offers ≤15 minutes, Tesorion offers Not disclosed. SecurityHQ covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do SecurityHQ and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
SecurityHQ supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with SecurityHQ and not included with Tesorion.
How does SecurityHQ pricing compare to Tesorion?
SecurityHQ pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with SecurityHQ: IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.; No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose SecurityHQ or Tesorion?
Choose SecurityHQ if: mid-market and enterprise organizations committed to existing EDR platforms who want SOC expertise without rip-and-replace. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. SecurityHQ is not ideal for teams wanting transparent pricing and published SLA credits upfront. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.