Arctic Wolf vs SecurityHQ: MDR comparison 2026
Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. SecurityHQ is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Arctic Wolf targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SecurityHQ serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Arctic Wolf if:
- •Mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service
- •IT teams managing multiple security tools that want a single pane of glass without replacing their existing stack
- •Organizations that value the industry's largest breach warranty ($3M) and compliance-aligned security reviews
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Arctic Wolf offers one, SecurityHQ does not)
Choose SecurityHQ if:
- •Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance
- •Organizations requiring global SOC coverage across UK, Middle East, APAC and Africa
Bottom line: Arctic Wolf (Pure-play MDR) and SecurityHQ (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Arctic Wolf's the concierge security team model is arctic wolf's core differentiator: a named team that knows y... or SecurityHQ's the core draw is keeping your existing edr stack while adding soc analyst coverage, backed by a c....
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Arctic Wolf and SecurityHQ?
Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SecurityHQ is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Arctic Wolf offers ≤1 hour, SecurityHQ offers ≤15 minutes.
How do Arctic Wolf and SecurityHQ differ in response capabilities?
Arctic Wolf supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, account disable) and approval is configurable. SecurityHQ supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Incident response is not included with Arctic Wolf and included with SecurityHQ.
How does Arctic Wolf pricing compare to SecurityHQ?
Arctic Wolf pricing: MDR Basic starts at $44,000/year for up to 100 users (AWS Marketplace). Median buyer-reported deal is $96,340/year based on 17 purchases (Vendr). Range: $29,176 to $319,984/year depending on scope.. SecurityHQ pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Arctic Wolf: Remediation is guided, not performed on your behalf. May need a separate IR retainer for hands-on incident response.; Normalized data and threat feeds are not directly accessible. You get dashboards and reports, not raw data.. Watch for with SecurityHQ: IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.; No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales..
Should I choose Arctic Wolf or SecurityHQ?
Choose Arctic Wolf if: mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service. Choose SecurityHQ if: mid-market and enterprise organizations committed to existing EDR platforms who want SOC expertise without rip-and-replace. Arctic Wolf is not ideal for security teams that want direct access to raw telemetry, custom detection engineering, or SIEM query capabilities. SecurityHQ is not ideal for teams wanting transparent pricing and published SLA credits upfront.