Ackcent Cybersecurity vs Tesorion
Ackcent Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Ackcent Cybersecurity targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Ackcent Cybersecurity includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Ackcent Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Ackcent Cybersecurity targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Ackcent Cybersecurity includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Ackcent Cybersecurity (Pure-play MDR) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Ackcent Cybersecurity's gartner-recognized european boutique mdr with native spanish support and bring-your-own-edr flexi... or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European or LATAM mid-market companies that want a boutique provider with native Spanish and English support | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European or LATAM mid-market companies that want a boutique provider with native Spanish and English support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Ackcent CybersecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | BlackBerry Cylance SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Stellar Cyber Open XDR | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantine | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote only. No published pricing or pricing calculator. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Advisory, Red Team, AppSec, and Training services are separate from base MDR. No public pricing makes cost comparison impossible without direct sales engagement. Breach and Attack Simulation (AttackIQ BAS) integration may carry additional licensing costs. With ~55 total employees, surge capacity during a major incident is unclear and may require external escalation | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeLatin America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not publicly disclosed | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailCritical InfrastructureSmart Cities | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Almost no English-language reviews exist. A handful of Gartner Peer Insights entries are positive, praising communication and dashboards. Zero reviews on G2 or PeerSpot, so community validation is essentially absent. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001GDPR | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | ISO 27001 | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2014 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Ackcent Cybersecurity and Tesorion?
Ackcent Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Ackcent Cybersecurity covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Ackcent Cybersecurity and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Ackcent Cybersecurity supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Ackcent Cybersecurity and not included with Tesorion.
How does Ackcent Cybersecurity pricing compare to Tesorion?
Ackcent Cybersecurity pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Ackcent Cybersecurity: Advisory, Red Team, AppSec, and Training services are separate from base MDR; No public pricing makes cost comparison impossible without direct sales engagement. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Ackcent Cybersecurity or Tesorion?
Choose Ackcent Cybersecurity if: european or LATAM mid-market companies that want a boutique provider with native Spanish and English support. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Ackcent Cybersecurity is not ideal for enterprises that need documented SLAs, published detection metrics, or transparent pricing before signing. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.