Defendable vs SecurityHQ
Defendable and SecurityHQ are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SecurityHQ serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for SecurityHQ (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable and SecurityHQ are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SecurityHQ serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for SecurityHQ (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
SecurityHQ offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 1). Defendable may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | SecurityHQTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | IBM QRadar |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | ≤15 minutes |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom pricing based on environment size, data volume and services required. Available through AWS Marketplace with private offers. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.. No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales.. Identity monitoring and SaaS coverage are scoped separately, which could increase costs significantly depending on your environment.. Multi-year contracts are typical in the MSSP market. Ask about early termination terms and auto-renewal clauses. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | EuropeMiddle EastNorth AmericaAPACAfrica |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyManufacturing |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Thin public review presence compared to larger MDR vendors. MITRE 2024 managed services evaluation showed strong detection with low alert noise. IDC MarketScape Leader for Middle East MDR in 2024 and 2025. Technology-agnostic approach appeals to customers with existing EDR investments, but no published pricing and few customer references make independent evaluation difficult. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | ISO 27001CREST |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | ISO 27001CREST SOC Accreditation |
| Founded | 2020 | 2003 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published. Varies by SIEM deployment and customer contract. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and SecurityHQ?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SecurityHQ is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Defendable offers Not disclosed, SecurityHQ offers ≤15 minutes. Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for SecurityHQ.
How do Defendable and SecurityHQ differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. SecurityHQ supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Incident response is not included with Defendable and included with SecurityHQ.
How does Defendable pricing compare to SecurityHQ?
Defendable pricing: Not published. SecurityHQ pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with SecurityHQ: IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.; No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales..
Should I choose Defendable or SecurityHQ?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose SecurityHQ if: mid-market and enterprise organizations committed to existing EDR platforms who want SOC expertise without rip-and-replace. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. SecurityHQ is not ideal for teams wanting transparent pricing and published SLA credits upfront.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.