Daylight Security vs Defendable
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Daylight Security targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Daylight Security includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity), compared to 1 for Defendable (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Daylight Security targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Daylight Security includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity), compared to 1 for Defendable (Endpoint).
Daylight Security (Platform vendor) and Defendable (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Daylight Security's ai-native mdr that combines an agentic platform with a team of security experts with ir and threa... or Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Daylight SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft Defender for EndpointPalo Alto Cortex XDRVMware Carbon Black Cloud | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkIBM QRadarCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEMCoralogixDatadogElasticGoogle ChroniclePantherSumo Logic Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤15 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user per-month subscription with contract term discounts | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No breach warranty offered. If warranty coverage matters for your risk calculus, this is a gap.. 36-month contracts offer deeper discounts but lock you into a company with under two years of operating history.. No FedRAMP authorization. Not a fit for federal workloads requiring FedRAMP. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | 12 months, 24 months, 36 months | Custom, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | SlackTeamsEmailPortal | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEurope | Europe |
| Onboarding | Under 1 hour | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesProfessional Services | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Public Gartner Peer Insights pages show a 5.0 average for Daylight Security as of May 2026, but review volume is still light compared to established MDR vendors. Coverage on G2 and PeerSpot is thin, and Reddit presence is minimal. | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001:2022 | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (AICPA, 31 March 2025)ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (IQNET, 14 December 2025) | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified |
| Founded | 2024 | 2020 |
| Data retention | 90 days, with optional agentic security data lake | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Daylight Security and Defendable?
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Daylight Security offers ≤15 minutes, Defendable offers Not disclosed. Daylight Security covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Defendable.
How do Daylight Security and Defendable differ in response capabilities?
Daylight Security supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Daylight Security and not included with Defendable.
How does Daylight Security pricing compare to Defendable?
Daylight Security pricing: Not published. Defendable pricing: Not published. Watch for with Daylight Security: No breach warranty offered. If warranty coverage matters for your risk calculus, this is a gap.; 36-month contracts offer deeper discounts but lock you into a company with under two years of operating history.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published..
Should I choose Daylight Security or Defendable?
Choose Daylight Security if: mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers. Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Daylight Security is not ideal for risk-averse organizations requiring a multi-year proven operational track record and broad independent review coverage. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales.