Defendable vs Orange Cyberdefense
Defendable and Orange Cyberdefense are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Orange Cyberdefense serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Orange Cyberdefense (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable and Orange Cyberdefense are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Orange Cyberdefense serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Orange Cyberdefense (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Orange Cyberdefense offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 1). Defendable may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence |
| Price | Custom quote | Azure package: EUR 3,300/mo for 300 users |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence
- Price
- Azure package: EUR 3,300/mo for 300 users
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | Orange CyberdefenseTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Palo Alto Cortex Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Azure Marketplace: Managed Threat Detection [XDR] for Defender Endpoint P2: 3,300 EUR/month for 300 users. Managed Threat Detection [log] for Sentinel: 16,500 EUR/month up to 50 GB/day. Third-party estimate: avg ~$37K/year, max ~$100K/year. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Enterprise custom pricing. Some SKUs listed on Azure Marketplace with fixed monthly rates. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Core MDR platforms are Microsoft Defender or Palo Alto Cortex, licensing costs are separate. Multiple add-on services (threat intelligence, cybercrime monitoring, brand protection) add up. Non-European buyers may find fewer local SOC analysts and slower regional support outside EMEA hours. No published rate card or minimum seat count, making it hard to budget without a sales conversation. Sentinel consumption costs (if using Microsoft platform) are separate |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year enterprise agreements |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | EuropeNorth AmericaAfricaAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not publicly specified. Expect enterprise-scale timelines. |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetail/DistributionEnergyTransportGovernment/Public SectorIndustrial/OTManufacturing |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Strong analyst recognition: Forrester Strong Performer for MDR Europe (Q3 2025), IDC MarketScape European MDR Leader (2024). Zero practitioner reviews found on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit, which makes independent validation impossible. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2 Type 2PCI DSS (QSA and ASV)ANSSI (French national cybersecurity agency)CRESTNATO Security Accreditation |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | SOC 2 Type 2PCI DSS QSA (Qualified Security Assessor)PCI DSS ASV (Approved Scanning Vendor)ANSSI PASSI RGS/LPM, PDIS LPM, PRISCREST (international infosec accreditation)FIRST MembershipNATO Security AccreditationTF-CSIRT (European task force)Europol PartnershipMicrosoft Solutions Partner (Security, Azure) |
| Founded | 2020 | 2014 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not publicly specified |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Orange Cyberdefense?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Orange Cyberdefense is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Orange Cyberdefense.
How do Defendable and Orange Cyberdefense differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Orange Cyberdefense supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Orange Cyberdefense?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Orange Cyberdefense pricing: Azure Marketplace: Managed Threat Detection [XDR] for Defender Endpoint P2: 3,300 EUR/month for 300 users. Managed Threat Detection [log] for Sentinel: 16,500 EUR/month up to 50 GB/day. Third-party estimate: avg ~$37K/year, max ~$100K/year.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Orange Cyberdefense: Core MDR platforms are Microsoft Defender or Palo Alto Cortex, licensing costs are separate; Multiple add-on services (threat intelligence, cybercrime monitoring, brand protection) add up.
Should I choose Defendable or Orange Cyberdefense?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Orange Cyberdefense if: large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Orange Cyberdefense is not ideal for sMBs or cost-sensitive buyers, as pricing is enterprise-tier with no public rate cards.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.