Defendable vs Kroll
Defendable and Kroll are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Kroll serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Kroll (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable and Kroll are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Kroll serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Kroll (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Kroll offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 1). Defendable may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR with 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection |
| Price | Custom quote | Unverified MDR field estimate: $30K-$200K+/yr |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | $1,000,000 |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR with 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection
- Price
- Unverified MDR field estimate: $30K-$200K+/yr
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- $1,000,000
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | KrollTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrike FalconSentinelOne Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | $1,000,000 |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom quote-based pricing, not publicly disclosed |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency, customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility. Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost, cost delta not disclosed. No published minimum seat requirements or pricing, likely enterprise-focused |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Varies by environment complexity |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentRetailTechnologyEducation |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Trusted for deep IR pedigree and Complete Response methodology. Gartner Peer Insights 4.6/5 (26 reviews). KuppingerCole MDR Leader 2023. Lower market visibility than pure-play MDR brands (~0.4% PeerSpot mindshare). December 2025 CrowdStrike migration generates mixed reactions around vendor lock-in. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSS |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001CREST |
| Founded | 2020 | 1972 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not publicly disclosed. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Kroll?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Kroll is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Kroll.
How do Defendable and Kroll differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Defendable and included with Kroll.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Kroll?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency, customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost, cost delta not disclosed.
Should I choose Defendable or Kroll?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR with 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.