Daylight Security vs Kroll: MDR comparison 2026
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Kroll is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Daylight Security targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Kroll serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Daylight Security includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Kroll (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Daylight Security if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers
- •Technology and finance companies comfortable adopting early-stage vendors with tier-1 VC backing
- •Teams wanting ChatOps-native collaboration via Slack/Teams with sub-hour deployment time
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Choose Kroll if:
- •Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR with 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection
- •Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis
- •Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Kroll offers one, Daylight Security does not)
Bottom line: Daylight Security (Platform vendor) and Kroll (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Daylight Security's ai-native mdr that deploys in under an hour and works with your existing edr or Kroll's kroll responder's differentiator is depth of real-world ir experience: 3,000+ annual breach inves....
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Daylight Security and Kroll?
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Kroll is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Daylight Security covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Kroll.
How do Daylight Security and Kroll differ in response capabilities?
Daylight Security supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Daylight Security pricing compare to Kroll?
Daylight Security pricing: $10-30/endpoint/month. Annual contracts typically $115,000-$130,000 for mid-market.. Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Watch for with Daylight Security: Founded late 2024 with no public compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001). If your procurement requires these, you may face delays or blockers.; Identity and cloud workload modules are on the roadmap but not GA. You may need separate tooling for those surfaces now.. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency, customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost, cost delta not disclosed.
Should I choose Daylight Security or Kroll?
Choose Daylight Security if: mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers. Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR with 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection. Daylight Security is not ideal for risk-averse organizations requiring multi-year proven operational track record and independent reviews. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility).