Deepwatch vs Tesorion
Deepwatch is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Deepwatch targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Deepwatch is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Deepwatch targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Deepwatch (Pure-play MDR) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Deepwatch's siem-centric, vendor-agnostic mdr with patented drs engine (98% fp reduction claim), dedicated sq... or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market to enterprise with existing Splunk, Sentinel, Google SecOps, or Securonix SIEM investments | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Buyer benchmark: median $218,983/yr | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market to enterprise with existing Splunk, Sentinel, Google SecOps, or Securonix SIEM investments
- Price
- Buyer benchmark: median $218,983/yr
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DeepwatchTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Splunk Enterprise & CloudGoogle SecOps (Chronicle)Microsoft SentinelSecuronix (added Feb 2026) | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: Optional add-onCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Third-party buyer data reports a $218,983/year median buyer cost for Deepwatch, with a visible public range from $126,904 to $322,131/year. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Volume-based (data ingestion volume in GB/TB per day or Splunk Virtual Compute units), not per-endpoint | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Volume-based pricing means unexpected data growth can cause cost spikes. Three platform tiers (Core, Advanced, Enterprise) may gate Active Response behind higher tiers.. MEDR (endpoint detection) is a separate add-on, not included in base MDR. MDR Essentials is a limited entry point with fewer capabilities than full platform tiers | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom enterprise | Custom |
| Channels | SlackEmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | 30 days typical. MDR Essentials can launch SOC in under 1 hour. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesManufacturingRetailEnergy | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Customer reviews are positive (Gartner Peer Insights 4.2/5 from 59 reviews, G2 High Performer Fall 2025), praising Squad team and DRS technology. Employee sentiment is concerning: Glassdoor 2.9/5 (215 reviews, 35% recommend). 42% headcount reduction (412 to 239 employees) across 2024-2025, founding CEO departed to competitor Mitiga Jan 2025. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2022PCI DSS Level 1 | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, certified since inception)ISO 27001:2022 (first certified 2024)PCI DSS Level 1 Service Provider (since inception) | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Data retention | 12 months hot data retention (Platform Core tier) | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Deepwatch and Tesorion?
Deepwatch is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Deepwatch and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Deepwatch supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Deepwatch pricing compare to Tesorion?
Deepwatch pricing: Third-party buyer data reports a $218,983/year median buyer cost for Deepwatch, with a visible public range from $126,904 to $322,131/year.. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Deepwatch: Volume-based pricing means unexpected data growth can cause cost spikes. Three platform tiers (Core, Advanced, Enterprise) may gate Active Response behind higher tiers.; MEDR (endpoint detection) is a separate add-on, not included in base MDR. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Deepwatch or Tesorion?
Choose Deepwatch if: mid-market to enterprise with existing Splunk, Sentinel, Google SecOps, or Securonix SIEM investments. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Deepwatch is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations ($220K-$315K/year is enterprise-oriented). Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.