Arctic Wolf vs Deepwatch
Arctic Wolf and Deepwatch are both Pure-play MDRs that work with your existing tools. Arctic Wolf targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Deepwatch serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Arctic Wolf includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Deepwatch (Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Arctic Wolf and Deepwatch are both Pure-play MDRs that work with your existing tools. Arctic Wolf targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Deepwatch serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Arctic Wolf includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Deepwatch (Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Deepwatch offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 3). Arctic Wolf may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service | Mid-market to enterprise with existing Splunk, Sentinel, Google SecOps, or Securonix SIEM investments |
| Price | $12-18/endpoint/mo | Buyer benchmark: median $218,983/yr |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | $3,000,000 | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service
- Price
- $12-18/endpoint/mo
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- $3,000,000
- Best fit
- Mid-market to enterprise with existing Splunk, Sentinel, Google SecOps, or Securonix SIEM investments
- Price
- Buyer benchmark: median $218,983/yr
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Arctic WolfTECH-AGNOSTIC | DeepwatchTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Arctic Wolf AgentAurora Endpoint SecuritySentinelOne SingularityFortiEDR CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | SentinelOne CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | Aurora Platform | Splunk Enterprise & CloudGoogle SecOps (Chronicle)Microsoft SentinelSecuronix (added Feb 2026) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: Optional add-onCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainDisable accounts | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Third-party buyer data reports Arctic Wolf MDR observed pricing around $12-18/endpoint/month for 100-500 endpoint buyers and $8-14/endpoint/month for 1,000+ endpoint buyers. AWS Marketplace also lists MDR Basic starting at $44,000/year for up to 100 users. | Third-party buyer data reports a $218,983/year median buyer cost for Deepwatch, with a visible public range from $126,904 to $322,131/year. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | $3,000,000 | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤1 hour | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user pricing with multiple license types. Limited User ~$20/user/month, Standard User ~$200/user/month. Aurora Managed Endpoint Defense ~$110/device/month. Bundled in Core, Plus, and Total tiers with Silver/Gold/Platinum concierge levels. | Volume-based (data ingestion volume in GB/TB per day or Splunk Virtual Compute units), not per-endpoint |
| Hidden cost warnings | Remediation is guided, not performed on your behalf. May need a separate IR retainer for hands-on incident response.. Normalized data and threat feeds are not directly accessible. You get dashboards and reports, not raw data.. $3M warranty requires Aurora Managed Endpoint Defense plus a Security Operations Bundle, creating platform dependency.. Multiple license types (Limited at $20, Standard at $200) at very different price points. Clarify which applies to your deployment.. Full security posture takes several months in complex environments despite a 30-day onboarding target. | Volume-based pricing means unexpected data growth can cause cost spikes. Three platform tiers (Core, Advanced, Enterprise) may gate Active Response behind higher tiers.. MEDR (endpoint detection) is a separate add-on, not included in base MDR. MDR Essentials is a limited entry point with fewer capabilities than full platform tiers |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, 2-year, 3-year | Custom enterprise |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | SlackEmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | North America |
| Onboarding | 30 days or less with a dedicated onboarding team. Full security posture takes several months in complex environments. | 30 days typical. MDR Essentials can launch SOC in under 1 hour. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareTechnologyManufacturingRetailGovernment | HealthcareFinancial ServicesManufacturingRetailEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published. Arctic Wolf reports ~7-minute Mean Time to Ticket (alert to ticket creation), which is not the same as MTTR. | Not published |
| Community view | Polarizing along predictable lines. Gartner Peer Insights rates 4.8/5 (451+ reviews) and G2 4.7/5 (~276 reviews), with mid-market customers praising the Concierge model. Reddit and practitioner forums are more critical, with recurring complaints about false positive rates, limited data transparency, and guided-not-hands-on remediation. PeerSpot mindshare dropped ~48% year-over-year. | Customer reviews are positive (Gartner Peer Insights 4.2/5 from 59 reviews, G2 High Performer Fall 2025), praising Squad team and DRS technology. Employee sentiment is concerning: Glassdoor 2.9/5 (215 reviews, 35% recommend). 42% headcount reduction (412 to 239 employees) across 2024-2025, founding CEO departed to competitor Mitiga Jan 2025. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001CMMCPCI DSSHIPAAFTC Safeguards Rule | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2022PCI DSS Level 1 |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2013 | SOC 2 Type II (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, certified since inception)ISO 27001:2022 (first certified 2024)PCI DSS Level 1 Service Provider (since inception) |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
| Data retention | 90 days standard. Extended retention available as add-on (up to 10 years). Data sovereignty options: US, Canada, Germany, or Australia. | 12 months hot data retention (Platform Core tier) |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Arctic Wolf and Deepwatch?
Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Deepwatch is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Arctic Wolf offers ≤1 hour, Deepwatch offers Not disclosed. Arctic Wolf covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Deepwatch.
How do Arctic Wolf and Deepwatch differ in response capabilities?
Arctic Wolf supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Deepwatch supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Arctic Wolf pricing compare to Deepwatch?
Arctic Wolf pricing: Third-party buyer data reports Arctic Wolf MDR observed pricing around $12-18/endpoint/month for 100-500 endpoint buyers and $8-14/endpoint/month for 1,000+ endpoint buyers. AWS Marketplace also lists MDR Basic starting at $44,000/year for up to 100 users.. Deepwatch pricing: Third-party buyer data reports a $218,983/year median buyer cost for Deepwatch, with a visible public range from $126,904 to $322,131/year.. Watch for with Arctic Wolf: Remediation is guided, not performed on your behalf. May need a separate IR retainer for hands-on incident response.; Normalized data and threat feeds are not directly accessible. You get dashboards and reports, not raw data.. Watch for with Deepwatch: Volume-based pricing means unexpected data growth can cause cost spikes. Three platform tiers (Core, Advanced, Enterprise) may gate Active Response behind higher tiers.; MEDR (endpoint detection) is a separate add-on, not included in base MDR.
Should I choose Arctic Wolf or Deepwatch?
Choose Arctic Wolf if: mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service. Choose Deepwatch if: mid-market to enterprise with existing Splunk, Sentinel, Google SecOps, or Securonix SIEM investments. Arctic Wolf is not ideal for security teams that want direct access to raw telemetry, custom detection engineering, or SIEM query capabilities. Deepwatch is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations ($220K-$315K/year is enterprise-oriented).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.