CyberMaxx vs Tesorion
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberMaxx targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. CyberMaxx includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberMaxx targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. CyberMaxx includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
CyberMaxx (Pure-play MDR) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize CyberMaxx's healthcare-focused mdr with a zero-latency response model and 24x7x365 threat responders or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberMaxxTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkElasticExabeamDevoLevelBlueCustomer-provided SIEM | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Isolate | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Three-tier pricing structure (Core, Advanced, Elite). Pricing varies by tier, environment size, EDR platform choice, and SIEM deployment model (managed vs. co-managed). Custom quotes based on coverage scope. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.. Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page.. EDR platform licenses (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Microsoft Defender) are required and not included in the MDR price.. Core tier only covers endpoints OR cloud email, not both. Advanced required for combined coverage.. Three acquisitions in two years. Ask how consolidated the tooling and SOC operations actually are today. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Under two months for full MDR ramp-up | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesState and Local GovernmentEducation | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (15 reviews in MDR category). MSSP Alert Top 250 provider (Top 50 in 2023). Small review sample compared to peers like Arctic Wolf (451+ reviews) or Expel (142 reviews). Praised for customer support and healthcare expertise. Almost no Reddit or G2 discussion. Three acquisitions in two years (CipherTechs 2023, Cybersafe and onShore Security Jan 2025) suggest rapid growth but integration risk is real. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIHIPAA-aligned services | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (audited by Insyte CPAs, LLC) | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2002 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by SIEM platform and customer contract. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between CyberMaxx and Tesorion?
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). CyberMaxx covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do CyberMaxx and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
CyberMaxx supports 1 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does CyberMaxx pricing compare to Tesorion?
CyberMaxx pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with CyberMaxx: Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.; Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose CyberMaxx or Tesorion?
Choose CyberMaxx if: healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. CyberMaxx is not ideal for buyers who need published MTTD/MTTR metrics or MITRE-validated detection to satisfy internal stakeholders. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.