Ackcent Cybersecurity vs CyberMaxx
Ackcent Cybersecurity and CyberMaxx are both Pure-play MDRs that work with your existing tools. Ackcent Cybersecurity targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while CyberMaxx serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Ackcent Cybersecurity includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for CyberMaxx (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Ackcent Cybersecurity and CyberMaxx are both Pure-play MDRs that work with your existing tools. Ackcent Cybersecurity targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while CyberMaxx serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Ackcent Cybersecurity includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for CyberMaxx (Endpoint).
Ackcent Cybersecurity offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 1). CyberMaxx may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European or LATAM mid-market companies that want a boutique provider with native Spanish and English support | Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise |
| Price | Not published | Not published |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European or LATAM mid-market companies that want a boutique provider with native Spanish and English support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Ackcent CybersecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | CyberMaxxTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | BlackBerry Cylance SentinelOne | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Stellar Cyber Open XDR | SplunkElasticExabeamDevoLevelBlueCustomer-provided SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantine | Isolate |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Identity | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote only. No published pricing or pricing calculator. | Three-tier pricing structure (Core, Advanced, Elite). Pricing varies by tier, environment size, EDR platform choice, and SIEM deployment model (managed vs. co-managed). Custom quotes based on coverage scope. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Advisory, Red Team, AppSec, and Training services are separate from base MDR. No public pricing makes cost comparison impossible without direct sales engagement. Breach and Attack Simulation (AttackIQ BAS) integration may carry additional licensing costs. With ~55 total employees, surge capacity during a major incident is unclear and may require external escalation | Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.. Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page.. EDR platform licenses (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Microsoft Defender) are required and not included in the MDR price.. Core tier only covers endpoints OR cloud email, not both. Advanced required for combined coverage.. Three acquisitions in two years. Ask how consolidated the tooling and SOC operations actually are today. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeLatin America | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not publicly disclosed | Under two months for full MDR ramp-up |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailCritical InfrastructureSmart Cities | HealthcareFinancial ServicesState and Local GovernmentEducation |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Almost no English-language reviews exist. A handful of Gartner Peer Insights entries are positive, praising communication and dashboards. Zero reviews on G2 or PeerSpot, so community validation is essentially absent. | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (15 reviews in MDR category). MSSP Alert Top 250 provider (Top 50 in 2023). Small review sample compared to peers like Arctic Wolf (451+ reviews) or Expel (142 reviews). Praised for customer support and healthcare expertise. Almost no Reddit or G2 discussion. Three acquisitions in two years (CipherTechs 2023, Cybersafe and onShore Security Jan 2025) suggest rapid growth but integration risk is real. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001GDPR | SOC 2 Type IIHIPAA-aligned services |
| Certifications | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II (audited by Insyte CPAs, LLC) |
| Founded | 2014 | 2002 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | Not published. Varies by SIEM platform and customer contract. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Ackcent Cybersecurity and CyberMaxx?
Ackcent Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Ackcent Cybersecurity covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for CyberMaxx.
How do Ackcent Cybersecurity and CyberMaxx differ in response capabilities?
Ackcent Cybersecurity supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. CyberMaxx supports 1 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Ackcent Cybersecurity and not included with CyberMaxx.
How does Ackcent Cybersecurity pricing compare to CyberMaxx?
Ackcent Cybersecurity pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. CyberMaxx pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Ackcent Cybersecurity: Advisory, Red Team, AppSec, and Training services are separate from base MDR; No public pricing makes cost comparison impossible without direct sales engagement. Watch for with CyberMaxx: Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.; Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page..
Should I choose Ackcent Cybersecurity or CyberMaxx?
Choose Ackcent Cybersecurity if: european or LATAM mid-market companies that want a boutique provider with native Spanish and English support. Choose CyberMaxx if: healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise. Ackcent Cybersecurity is not ideal for enterprises that need documented SLAs, published detection metrics, or transparent pricing before signing. CyberMaxx is not ideal for buyers who need published MTTD/MTTR metrics or MITRE-validated detection to satisfy internal stakeholders.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.