CyberMaxx vs Defendable
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberMaxx targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberMaxx targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
CyberMaxx (Pure-play MDR) and Defendable (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize CyberMaxx's healthcare-focused mdr with a zero-latency response model and 24x7x365 threat responders or Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberMaxxTECH-AGNOSTIC | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconSentinelOne Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkElasticExabeamDevoLevelBlueCustomer-provided SIEM | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Isolate | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Identity | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Three-tier pricing structure (Core, Advanced, Elite). Pricing varies by tier, environment size, EDR platform choice, and SIEM deployment model (managed vs. co-managed). Custom quotes based on coverage scope. | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.. Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page.. EDR platform licenses (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Microsoft Defender) are required and not included in the MDR price.. Core tier only covers endpoints OR cloud email, not both. Advanced required for combined coverage.. Three acquisitions in two years. Ask how consolidated the tooling and SOC operations actually are today. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Under two months for full MDR ramp-up | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesState and Local GovernmentEducation | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (15 reviews in MDR category). MSSP Alert Top 250 provider (Top 50 in 2023). Small review sample compared to peers like Arctic Wolf (451+ reviews) or Expel (142 reviews). Praised for customer support and healthcare expertise. Almost no Reddit or G2 discussion. Three acquisitions in two years (CipherTechs 2023, Cybersafe and onShore Security Jan 2025) suggest rapid growth but integration risk is real. | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIHIPAA-aligned services | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (audited by Insyte CPAs, LLC) | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified |
| Founded | 2002 | 2020 |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by SIEM platform and customer contract. | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between CyberMaxx and Defendable?
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do CyberMaxx and Defendable differ in response capabilities?
CyberMaxx supports 1 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does CyberMaxx pricing compare to Defendable?
CyberMaxx pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Defendable pricing: Not published. Watch for with CyberMaxx: Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.; Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published..
Should I choose CyberMaxx or Defendable?
Choose CyberMaxx if: healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise. Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. CyberMaxx is not ideal for buyers who need published MTTD/MTTR metrics or MITRE-validated detection to satisfy internal stakeholders. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.