ThreatDown vs WithSecure: MDR Comparison 2026
ThreatDown (MDR provider) and WithSecure (EDR vendor) take different approaches to managed detection and response. ThreatDown requires its own security platform, while WithSecure requires its own security platform. ThreatDown targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; WithSecure focuses on SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. ThreatDown includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for WithSecure (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
ThreatDown vs WithSecure: Which Should You Choose?
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Choose WithSecure if:
- •European mid-market organizations prioritizing EU data residency, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance
- •Companies wanting a single-vendor platform (EPP + EDR + XDR + MDR) with included IR
- •Organizations needing NCSC CIR Level 1 assured incident response (UK/EU government-adjacent)
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
Bottom line: ThreatDown (MDR provider) and WithSecure (EDR vendor) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize ThreatDown's one of the most affordable mdr options with fully published pricing ($99/endpoint/year) or WithSecure's the strongest european-focused mdr option for organizations prioritizing data sovereignty — forre....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between ThreatDown and WithSecure?
ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). WithSecure is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). ThreatDown covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for WithSecure.
How do ThreatDown and WithSecure differ in response capabilities?
ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. WithSecure supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with ThreatDown and included with WithSecure.
How does ThreatDown pricing compare to WithSecure?
ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). WithSecure pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Custom quotes required. Described as 'competitively priced for mid-sized businesses.' ITPro rated pricing 5/5 stars.. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender. Watch for with WithSecure: Platform lock-in — requires WithSecure Elements EDR (cannot use competing EDR); Modular pricing — full coverage across identity, cloud, SaaS, and exposure management adds cost.
Should I choose ThreatDown or WithSecure?
Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). Choose WithSecure if: european mid-market organizations prioritizing EU data residency, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT). WithSecure is not ideal for uS-centric organizations wanting FedRAMP or deep US federal compliance.