ThreatDown vs Todyl: MDR Comparison 2026
ThreatDown and Todyl are both categorized as MDR providers, but differ in execution. ThreatDown requires its own security platform and targets SMB and Mid-market organizations. Todyl requires its own security platform and focuses on SMB and Mid-market. ThreatDown includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Todyl (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
ThreatDown vs Todyl: Which Should You Choose?
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
Choose Todyl if:
- •MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management
- •SMBs with lean security teams wanting a dedicated security contact (DRAM) at an accessible price point
- •Greenfield deployments with no existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments to preserve
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
Bottom line: Todyl offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 1). ThreatDown may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between ThreatDown and Todyl?
ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Todyl is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). ThreatDown covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Todyl.
How do ThreatDown and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does ThreatDown pricing compare to Todyl?
ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published.. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in -- must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base -- unclear what modules are included at that tier.
Should I choose ThreatDown or Todyl?
Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). Choose Todyl if: mSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT). Todyl is not ideal for organizations with existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments -- requires full Todyl stack adoption.