Tesorion vs TrustNet GhostWatch
Tesorion and TrustNet GhostWatch are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Tesorion targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while TrustNet GhostWatch serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Tesorion includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch (Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Tesorion and TrustNet GhostWatch are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Tesorion targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while TrustNet GhostWatch serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Tesorion includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch (Cloud, Network).
Tesorion offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 2). TrustNet GhostWatch may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm | SaaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SaaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC | TrustNet GhostWatchTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | GhostWatch integrated SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | ContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom quote. TrustNet publishes flexible service tiers and says GhostWatch is available for an affordable fixed monthly fee, but no public managed-security price list was found. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. | TrustNet is compliance-heavy, so buyers should separate MDR and managed security operations cost from audit and advisory work.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named containment actions.. Endpoint coverage is less explicit than network, cloud, SIEM and vulnerability management coverage.. GhostWatch and TrustNet pages use both managed security and MDR language, so buyers should confirm exact service obligations in the order form. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, Monthly |
| Channels | EmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. | TrustNet says GhostWatch begins monitoring immediately after rapid deployment, with assessment and alignment before onboarding. A public standard onboarding timeline was not found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services | SaaSHealthcareRetailFinancial ServicesTechnologyCompliance-heavy organizations |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. | GhostWatch has limited MDR-specific community signal. TrustNet's public story is strongest around compliance, audits, MDR and managed security rather than independent MDR benchmarks. Treat buyer diligence as a service-scope exercise: verify response authority, telemetry sources and the split between security operations and compliance services. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO | SOC 2PCI DSSISO 27001HIPAAHITRUSTGDPRCCPACMMCNIST CSF |
| Certifications | ISO 27001NEN 7510 | PCI QSA |
| Founded | 2018 | 2003 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. | Not published as a standard GhostWatch retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Tesorion and TrustNet GhostWatch?
Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). TrustNet GhostWatch is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch.
How do Tesorion and TrustNet GhostWatch differ in response capabilities?
Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. TrustNet GhostWatch supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does Tesorion pricing compare to TrustNet GhostWatch?
Tesorion pricing: Not published. TrustNet GhostWatch pricing: Not published. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. Watch for with TrustNet GhostWatch: TrustNet is compliance-heavy, so buyers should separate MDR and managed security operations cost from audit and advisory work.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named containment actions..
Should I choose Tesorion or TrustNet GhostWatch?
Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Choose TrustNet GhostWatch if: saaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement. TrustNet GhostWatch is not ideal for buyers that need a pure-play MDR provider with published endpoint isolation and account containment actions.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.