Sophos vs Tesorion
Sophos is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Sophos targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Sophos includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Sophos is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Sophos targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Sophos includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Sophos is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Tesorion is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Existing Sophos endpoint or firewall customers adding managed services on their existing platform | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | $1,000,000 | None listed |
- Best fit
- Existing Sophos endpoint or firewall customers adding managed services on their existing platform
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- $1,000,000
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | SophosPLATFORM | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Very Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Sophos EndpointCrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderCarbon Black SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Sophos Central SIEM integration via API | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom quote required. Tiered pricing bands based on organization size. Starting price not publicly disclosed. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | $1,000,000 | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤1 hour | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user and per-server pricing. Two tiers: MDR Essentials (monitoring and basic response) and MDR Complete (full IR and breach warranty). | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | MDR Essentials does NOT include full incident response or breach warranty, requires MDR Complete upgrade. Linux server protection requires separate Sophos Workload Protection subscription. Post-Secureworks acquisition (Feb 2025): unclear if Sophos MDR and Taegis MDR will merge or remain separate products. Breach warranty limited to ONE claim total across all subscriptions, not per-incident | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Weeks, varies by environment size and integration scope | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingHealthcareFinancial ServicesRetailTechnology | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Sophos reports a 38-minute average case closure time. The MDR service description defines a 60-minute response-time SLA for 90% of High Severity Cases, with eligibility timing and service-credit limits. | Not published |
| Community view | G2: #1 overall MDR for 14 consecutive report cycles, 1,543 reviews, 95% satisfaction. Gartner Peer Insights: 2026 Customers' Choice for Endpoint Protection (4.9/5). MITRE ATT&CK 2025: 100% detection coverage. Praised for integration breadth and MDR Complete's all-in pricing. Recurring complaints about technical support responsiveness and endpoint agent resource usage. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2022ISO 27017:2015ISO 27018:2019PCI DSS v4.0GDPRHIPAAHITRUST CSF | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2022ISO 27017:2015ISO 27018:2019PCI DSS v4.0 | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 1985 | 2018 |
| Data retention | 90 days standard, 1-year extended available as add-on | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Sophos and Tesorion?
Sophos is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Sophos offers ≤1 hour, Tesorion offers Not disclosed. Sophos covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Sophos and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Sophos supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Sophos and not included with Tesorion.
How does Sophos pricing compare to Tesorion?
Sophos pricing: Custom quote required. Tiered pricing bands based on organization size. Starting price not publicly disclosed.. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Sophos: MDR Essentials does NOT include full incident response or breach warranty, requires MDR Complete upgrade; Linux server protection requires separate Sophos Workload Protection subscription. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Sophos or Tesorion?
Choose Sophos if: existing Sophos endpoint or firewall customers adding managed services on their existing platform. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Sophos is not ideal for organizations needing raw telemetry query access (Sophos Central provides dashboards only). Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.