Rapid7 vs Tesorion
Rapid7 is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Rapid7 targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Rapid7 includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Rapid7 is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Rapid7 targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Rapid7 includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Rapid7 is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Tesorion is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market to enterprise organizations (500+ assets) wanting full SIEM data transparency alongside MDR | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Est from ~$17/asset/mo, 500-asset min | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | $1,000,000 | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market to enterprise organizations (500+ assets) wanting full SIEM data transparency alongside MDR
- Price
- Est from ~$17/asset/mo, 500-asset min
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- $1,000,000
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Rapid7PLATFORM | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Rapid7 Insight AgentCarbon BlackCisco Secure EndpointCrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderPalo Alto CortexCybereasonTrend Micro SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | InsightIDR | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Third-party estimate: starting ~$17/asset/month. Mid-market deployments typically $60K-$80K/year. Enterprise $150K+/year. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | 500 | None |
| Breach warranty | $1,000,000 | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-asset monthly pricing. Three tiers: Essential, Advanced, Ultimate. Managed Threat Complete (MTC) bundles MDR + SIEM + VM + SOAR. MDR Elite available as standalone MDR service. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Requires Rapid7 Insight Agent on 80%+ of supported assets, minimum 500 assets. Breach warranty and unlimited DFIR only available on Ultimate tier. Essential tier has no dedicated cybersecurity advisors (Support Center only). Custom event sources and custom detections only on Advanced/Ultimate tiers | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom |
| Channels | SlackEmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Weeks, varies by environment size and Insight Agent deployment scope | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingHealthcareFinancial ServicesTechnologyRetail | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | No absolute MTTD published. Comparative claim: 63% faster than in-house SOC teams. | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | PeerSpot 8.6/10 (MDR). Gartner SIEM MQ recognized 7th year (2025). MITRE 2023: all 19 Turla attack phases detected. Praised for data transparency and analyst pod familiarity. Company underwent 18% layoffs in Aug 2023, explored PE sale in Q4 2024 (no deal), Jana Partners activist investor added 3 board seats in 2025. Revenue $860M (FY2025), guidance for 2026 slightly lower ($835-843M). | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRCyber Essentials PlusFedRAMP Moderate (InsightGovCloud) | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusFedRAMP Moderate (InsightGovCloud Platform) | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2000 | 2018 |
| Data retention | 13 months | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Rapid7 and Tesorion?
Rapid7 is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Rapid7 covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Rapid7 and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Rapid7 supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Rapid7 and not included with Tesorion.
How does Rapid7 pricing compare to Tesorion?
Rapid7 pricing: Third-party estimate: starting ~$17/asset/month. Mid-market deployments typically $60K-$80K/year. Enterprise $150K+/year. (500-seat minimum). Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Rapid7: Requires Rapid7 Insight Agent on 80%+ of supported assets, minimum 500 assets; Breach warranty and unlimited DFIR only available on Ultimate tier. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Rapid7 or Tesorion?
Choose Rapid7 if: mid-market to enterprise organizations (500+ assets) wanting full SIEM data transparency alongside MDR. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Rapid7 is not ideal for organizations with fewer than 500 assets (minimum requirement). Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.