Performanta vs Proficio
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Proficio is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Proficio serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Proficio is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Proficio serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Performanta (Services firm) and Proficio (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-... or Proficio's the core differentiator is siem flexibility: proficio works with your existing siem or hosts one ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response | Mid-market organizations with existing Splunk, Sentinel, or Elastic wanting managed detection without rip-and-replace |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market organizations with existing Splunk, Sentinel, or Elastic wanting managed detection without rip-and-replace
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC | ProficioTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrike |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | SplunkElasticProficio-hosted SIEM Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. | Custom pricing. SOC-as-a-Service model based on log volume and scope. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | Base ProSOC MDR is monitoring and alerting only. Automated containment (Active Defense) is a separate paid add-on, so budget accordingly.. Log volume directly affects pricing. If your environment grows or you add new log sources, expect cost increases.. Custom SIEM use case development and detection rule tuning may be billed separately from the base contract.. Endpoint-specific MDR (MEDR) is a separate product from log-based MDR. Clarify which you are being quoted for. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfrica | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. | Typically 30 days |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism | Financial ServicesHealthcareManufacturingGovernmentTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | <20 minutes (2024 outcomes report) |
| MTTR | Not published | <5 minutes with Active Defense (add-on). Active Defense is not included in base ProSOC MDR. |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. | Too few public reviews to draw strong conclusions. Gartner Peer Insights shows 3.8/5 from only 8 reviews. No G2 or PeerSpot reviews. Gartner Market Guide representative vendor since 2017, which signals analyst recognition, but buyer feedback is almost nonexistent online. |
| Compliance | – | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2013HIPAAGDPRPCI DSSGLBA/FFIECNIST Framework |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2013Singapore MSSP Certified SOC |
| Founded | 2010 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | Up to 12 months log retention |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Performanta and Proficio?
Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Proficio is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Performanta and Proficio differ in response capabilities?
Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Proficio supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Performanta pricing compare to Proficio?
Performanta pricing: Not published. Proficio pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Watch for with Proficio: Base ProSOC MDR is monitoring and alerting only. Automated containment (Active Defense) is a separate paid add-on, so budget accordingly.; Log volume directly affects pricing. If your environment grows or you add new log sources, expect cost increases..
Should I choose Performanta or Proficio?
Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Choose Proficio if: mid-market organizations with existing Splunk, Sentinel, or Elastic wanting managed detection without rip-and-replace. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Proficio is not ideal for organizations expecting automated response in base pricing (Active Defense is a paid add-on).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.