Daylight Security vs Performanta
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Daylight Security targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Daylight Security includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Buyer brief
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Daylight Security targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Daylight Security includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Daylight Security (Platform vendor) and Performanta (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Daylight Security's ai-native mdr that combines an agentic platform with a team of security experts with ir and threa... or Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Daylight SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft Defender for EndpointPalo Alto Cortex XDRVMware Carbon Black Cloud | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkIBM QRadarCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEMCoralogixDatadogElasticGoogle ChroniclePantherSumo Logic Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤15 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user per-month subscription with contract term discounts | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No breach warranty offered. If warranty coverage matters for your risk calculus, this is a gap.. 36-month contracts offer deeper discounts but lock you into a company with under two years of operating history.. No FedRAMP authorization. Not a fit for federal workloads requiring FedRAMP. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | 12 months, 24 months, 36 months | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | SlackTeamsEmailPortal | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEurope | EuropeAfrica |
| Onboarding | Under 1 hour | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesProfessional Services | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Public Gartner Peer Insights pages show a 5.0 average for Daylight Security as of May 2026, but review volume is still light compared to established MDR vendors. Coverage on G2 and PeerSpot is thin, and Reddit presence is minimal. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001:2022 | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (AICPA, 31 March 2025)ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (IQNET, 14 December 2025) | – |
| Founded | 2024 | 2010 |
| Data retention | 90 days, with optional agentic security data lake | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Daylight Security and Performanta?
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Daylight Security offers ≤15 minutes, Performanta offers Not disclosed. Daylight Security covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Performanta.
How do Daylight Security and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
Daylight Security supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Daylight Security and not included with Performanta.
How does Daylight Security pricing compare to Performanta?
Daylight Security pricing: Not published. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with Daylight Security: No breach warranty offered. If warranty coverage matters for your risk calculus, this is a gap.; 36-month contracts offer deeper discounts but lock you into a company with under two years of operating history.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose Daylight Security or Performanta?
Choose Daylight Security if: mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Daylight Security is not ideal for risk-averse organizations requiring a multi-year proven operational track record and broad independent review coverage. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.