Obrela vs Tesorion
Obrela and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Obrela targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Obrela and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Obrela targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | ObrelaTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Custom quotes only. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤15 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Four tiers: MDR Core Lite, Core Plus, CoreX Max, and CoreX Elite, with increasing detection content and hunting capabilities. Specialized modules (OT, Vessels, Brand) priced separately. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Threat hunting is an add-on at every tier, not included in base MDR. Four-tier model (Core Lite through CoreX Elite) with feature boundaries not publicly documented. OT, Vessels, and Brand modules each carry separate pricing on top of base MDR. Core and CoreX tiers are built around Microsoft Defender XDR and Sentinel, which may require Microsoft licensing you do not already own. Cloud workload monitoring currently supports only Microsoft Azure. AWS and GCP support is listed as 'future' on their website | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Not published | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeMEA | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareMaritimeEnergyManufacturingTelecommunications | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Under 15 minutes (vendor-published). Obrela's website claims 11.2-minute average for critical incidents, but this is self-reported, not independently validated. | Not published |
| Community view | Named in the Gartner Market Guide for MDR four times (2021, 2023, 2024, 2025) and included in Forrester Wave MDR Services Europe Q3 2025. Virtually no customer reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Glassdoor 3.7/5 (52 reviews, 63% recommend). Strong analyst recognition but almost no independent customer validation. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2013ISO 9001:2015ISO 22301:2019CRESTNCSC CIR Level 2Cyber EssentialsDESC (Dubai) | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2013ISO 9001:2015ISO 22301:2019CREST CertifiedNCSC CIR Level 2 Assured Service ProviderCyber EssentialsDESC Accreditation (Dubai)Microsoft MISA MemberTeleTrusT IT Security Made in EU | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2010 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Obrela and Tesorion?
Obrela is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Obrela offers ≤15 minutes, Tesorion offers Not disclosed.
How do Obrela and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Obrela supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Obrela and not included with Tesorion.
How does Obrela pricing compare to Tesorion?
Obrela pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Obrela: Threat hunting is an add-on at every tier, not included in base MDR; Four-tier model (Core Lite through CoreX Elite) with feature boundaries not publicly documented. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Obrela or Tesorion?
Choose Obrela if: european or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Obrela is not ideal for north American or APAC organizations needing local SOC presence. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.