N-able vs Tesorion
N-able is a MSP-channel that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. N-able targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. N-able includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
N-able is a MSP-channel that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. N-able targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. N-able includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
N-able (MSP-channel) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize N-able's unified security operations platform combining xdr, siem, soar, and ueba with vendor-agnostic mdr... or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | MSPs wanting a unified XDR + SIEM + SOAR + UEBA platform to reduce vendor sprawl | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | MSP security bundle: $90-$275/user/mo; not Adlumin standalone | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Own agent required | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | $500,000 | None listed |
- Best fit
- MSPs wanting a unified XDR + SIEM + SOAR + UEBA platform to reduce vendor sprawl
- Price
- MSP security bundle: $90-$275/user/mo; not Adlumin standalone
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Own agent required
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- $500,000
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | N-ableTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Built-in SIEM | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Third-party/MSP-channel estimate: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs. Exact Adlumin standalone pricing not published. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | $500,000 | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user per-month pricing through MSP channel. Three tiers: MDR Base (identity-focused ITDR for M365 only), MDR Standard, MDR Advanced (adds 90-day retention). | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | MDR Base tier is identity-only (M365 ITDR). MDR Standard required for endpoint/network/cloud coverage.. Data retention upgrade (30 to 90 days) requires Advanced tier. Pricing designed for MSP channel. Direct enterprise pricing may differ or be unavailable.. N-able acquisition creates roadmap and integration uncertainty | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEurope | Europe |
| Onboarding | 30 minutes deployment (vendor-claimed), 600+ hours of pre-built playbooks included | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareLegalGovernmentManufacturing | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | G2 4.8/5 and Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (3 reviews) show strong sentiment for customer support, ease of use, and platform features. Limited independent review data. MSP community reception to N-able acquisition is cautiously optimistic but creates integration uncertainty. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | HIPAAPCI DSSNISTGLBASOXFFIEC | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Data retention | 30 days (Standard), 90 days (Advanced tier) | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between N-able and Tesorion?
N-able is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). N-able covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do N-able and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
N-able supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with N-able and not included with Tesorion.
How does N-able pricing compare to Tesorion?
N-able pricing: Third-party/MSP-channel estimate: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs. Exact Adlumin standalone pricing not published.. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with N-able: MDR Base tier is identity-only (M365 ITDR). MDR Standard required for endpoint/network/cloud coverage.; Data retention upgrade (30 to 90 days) requires Advanced tier. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose N-able or Tesorion?
Choose N-able if: mSPs wanting a unified XDR + SIEM + SOAR + UEBA platform to reduce vendor sprawl. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. N-able is not ideal for large enterprises with existing SOC infrastructure and direct vendor relationships (MSP-channel only). Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.