Macquarie Government vs Orange Cyberdefense
Macquarie Government and Orange Cyberdefense are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Macquarie Government targets Enterprise organizations, while Orange Cyberdefense serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Macquarie Government includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Orange Cyberdefense (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Macquarie Government and Orange Cyberdefense are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Macquarie Government targets Enterprise organizations, while Orange Cyberdefense serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Macquarie Government includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Orange Cyberdefense (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Orange Cyberdefense offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 3). Macquarie Government may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR | Large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence |
| Price | Custom quote | Azure package: EUR 3,300/mo for 300 users |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence
- Price
- Azure package: EUR 3,300/mo for 300 users
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Macquarie GovernmentTECH-AGNOSTIC | Orange CyberdefenseTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security toolsWorkstation logs | Microsoft DefenderPalo Alto Cortex |
| SIEM integrations | Macquarie Government SIEMaaSSplunk EnterpriseCustomer SIEM platforms | Microsoft SentinelPalo Alto Cortex XSIAM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Azure Marketplace: Managed Threat Detection [XDR] for Defender Endpoint P2: 3,300 EUR/month for 300 users. Managed Threat Detection [log] for Sentinel: 16,500 EUR/month up to 50 GB/day. Third-party estimate: avg ~$37K/year, max ~$100K/year. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom government subscription and procurement model. SOCaaS, SIEMaaS and SASE pricing is not published. | Enterprise custom pricing. Some SKUs listed on Azure Marketplace with fixed monthly rates. |
| Hidden cost warnings | The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs.. SOCaaS is closely tied to Macquarie Government SIEMaaS, Splunk, sovereign hosting, SASE and gateway services; model migration work if replacing the service later.. Buyers should document which automated response actions are allowed by default and which require agency approval.. Log retention, ingestion, secure cloud, SASE and CTI options can materially change the total contract scope. | Core MDR platforms are Microsoft Defender or Palo Alto Cortex, licensing costs are separate. Multiple add-on services (threat intelligence, cybercrime monitoring, brand protection) add up. Non-European buyers may find fewer local SOC analysts and slower regional support outside EMEA hours. No published rate card or minimum seat count, making it hard to budget without a sales conversation. Sentinel consumption costs (if using Microsoft platform) are separate |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | SOCaaS subscription, SIEMaaS subscription, SASE for Government, Custom government procurement | Annual, Multi-year enterprise agreements |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | APAC | EuropeNorth AmericaAfricaAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Macquarie Government describes customized playbooks aligned with agency security processes and integration with existing security systems. | Not publicly specified. Expect enterprise-scale timelines. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentDefensePublic SectorCritical Infrastructure | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetail/DistributionEnergyTransportGovernment/Public SectorIndustrial/OTManufacturing |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Macquarie Government has strong vendor-controlled evidence for Australian government sovereignty, 24x7 SOC operations, SIEMaaS, threat intelligence and SASE integration, but little independent MDR-specific buyer-review signal in public communities. Government buyers should use procurement references to validate analyst quality, response authority, onboarding effort and Splunk/log-volume cost exposure. | Strong analyst recognition: Forrester Strong Performer for MDR Europe (Q3 2025), IDC MarketScape European MDR Leader (2024). Zero practitioner reviews found on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit, which makes independent validation impossible. |
| Compliance | Essential 8ISMIRAPASDACSCDISP | SOC 2 Type 2PCI DSS (QSA and ASV)ANSSI (French national cybersecurity agency)CRESTNATO Security Accreditation |
| Certifications | NV1-cleared specialistsIndustry Security Program memberAustralian Government Strategic certified data centresPROTECTED-level secure web gateway assessmentIRAP-aligned virtual services gateway language | SOC 2 Type 2PCI DSS QSA (Qualified Security Assessor)PCI DSS ASV (Approved Scanning Vendor)ANSSI PASSI RGS/LPM, PDIS LPM, PRISCREST (international infosec accreditation)FIRST MembershipNATO Security AccreditationTF-CSIRT (European task force)Europol PartnershipMicrosoft Solutions Partner (Security, Azure) |
| Founded | – | 2014 |
| Data retention | SIEMaaS pages describe sovereign local hosting and storage of up to seven years of security and event information. Public pages do not publish default retention for SOCaaS contracts or export terms. | Not publicly specified |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Macquarie Government and Orange Cyberdefense?
Macquarie Government is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Orange Cyberdefense is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macquarie Government covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Orange Cyberdefense.
How do Macquarie Government and Orange Cyberdefense differ in response capabilities?
Macquarie Government supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Orange Cyberdefense supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Macquarie Government pricing compare to Orange Cyberdefense?
Macquarie Government pricing: Not published. Orange Cyberdefense pricing: Azure Marketplace: Managed Threat Detection [XDR] for Defender Endpoint P2: 3,300 EUR/month for 300 users. Managed Threat Detection [log] for Sentinel: 16,500 EUR/month up to 50 GB/day. Third-party estimate: avg ~$37K/year, max ~$100K/year.. Watch for with Macquarie Government: The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs.. Watch for with Orange Cyberdefense: Core MDR platforms are Microsoft Defender or Palo Alto Cortex, licensing costs are separate; Multiple add-on services (threat intelligence, cybercrime monitoring, brand protection) add up.
Should I choose Macquarie Government or Orange Cyberdefense?
Choose Macquarie Government if: australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR. Choose Orange Cyberdefense if: large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence. Macquarie Government is not ideal for private-sector or non-Australian buyers that do not need a government-specific sovereign provider. Orange Cyberdefense is not ideal for sMBs or cost-sensitive buyers, as pricing is enterprise-tier with no public rate cards.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.