ITC Secure vs Obrela
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Obrela is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Obrela serves Mid-market and Enterprise. ITC Secure includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 4 for Obrela (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Obrela is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Obrela serves Mid-market and Enterprise. ITC Secure includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 4 for Obrela (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network).
ITC Secure (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Obrela (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize ITC Secure's itc secure fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mxdr with pulse portal visibility, service re... or Obrela's good fit for european/mena buyers who need ot or maritime mdr and are comfortable with a microsof....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform | European or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | ITC SecureTECH-AGNOSTIC | ObrelaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Custom quotes only. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | ≤15 minutes |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. ITC Secure does not publish MXDR powered by Pulse package pricing. | Custom pricing. Four tiers: MDR Core Lite, Core Plus, CoreX Max, and CoreX Elite, with increasing detection content and hunting capabilities. Specialized modules (OT, Vessels, Brand) priced separately. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. ITC Secure publishes broad MXDR components, including endpoint, identity, Office 365, cloud apps, storage, vulnerability management and OT. Buyers should confirm which components are included in their quote.. Public pages do not define default response authority, so containment permissions and approval rules should be written into the contract.. Incident response is listed as a separate service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MXDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | Threat hunting is an add-on at every tier, not included in base MDR. Four-tier model (Core Lite through CoreX Elite) with feature boundaries not publicly documented. OT, Vessels, and Brand modules each carry separate pricing on top of base MDR. Core and CoreX tiers are built around Microsoft Defender XDR and Sentinel, which may require Microsoft licensing you do not already own. Cloud workload monitoring currently supports only Microsoft Azure. AWS and GCP support is listed as 'future' on their website |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Custom, MXDR powered by Pulse, Managed services, Incident Response | Not published |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | EuropeMEA | |
| Onboarding | Not published. ITC Secure publishes security engineering and SOC onboarding as a build-and-deploy service, but no standard MXDR implementation duration was found. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesHealthcareMaritimeEnergyManufacturingTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Under 15 minutes (vendor-published). Obrela's website claims 11.2-minute average for critical incidents, but this is self-reported, not independently validated. |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on ITC Secure's Microsoft focus, Microsoft Verified Managed XDR status, Pulse portal, long managed-service history and broad MXDR service components. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, SOC operating model and exact component inclusion directly. | Named in the Gartner Market Guide for MDR four times (2021, 2023, 2024, 2025) and included in Forrester Wave MDR Services Europe Q3 2025. Virtually no customer reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Glassdoor 3.7/5 (52 reviews, 63% recommend). Strong analyst recognition but almost no independent customer validation. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1 | ISO 27001:2013ISO 9001:2015ISO 22301:2019CRESTNCSC CIR Level 2Cyber EssentialsDESC (Dubai) |
| Certifications | Microsoft Verified Managed XDRMicrosoft Solutions Partner in SecurityMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Modern WorkMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Infrastructure AzureMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationCyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1ISO/IEC 27001Great Place to Work Certification | ISO 27001:2013ISO 9001:2015ISO 22301:2019CREST CertifiedNCSC CIR Level 2 Assured Service ProviderCyber EssentialsDESC Accreditation (Dubai)Microsoft MISA MemberTeleTrusT IT Security Made in EU |
| Founded | – | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published. ITC Secure says Pulse provides visibility into customer security posture, activities, incident trends, Microsoft license consumption and service metrics. No standard public MXDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between ITC Secure and Obrela?
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Obrela is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: ITC Secure offers Not disclosed, Obrela offers ≤15 minutes. ITC Secure covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Obrela.
How do ITC Secure and Obrela differ in response capabilities?
ITC Secure supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. Obrela supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with ITC Secure and included with Obrela.
How does ITC Secure pricing compare to Obrela?
ITC Secure pricing: Not published. Obrela pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Watch for with ITC Secure: Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. Watch for with Obrela: Threat hunting is an add-on at every tier, not included in base MDR; Four-tier model (Core Lite through CoreX Elite) with feature boundaries not publicly documented.
Should I choose ITC Secure or Obrela?
Choose ITC Secure if: microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform. Choose Obrela if: european or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency. ITC Secure is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Obrela is not ideal for north American or APAC organizations needing local SOC presence.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.