Daylight Security vs ITC Secure
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Daylight Security targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ITC Secure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Daylight Security includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity), compared to 3 for ITC Secure (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Daylight Security targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ITC Secure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Daylight Security includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity), compared to 3 for ITC Secure (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Daylight Security (Platform vendor) and ITC Secure (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Daylight Security's ai-native mdr that combines an agentic platform with a team of security experts with ir and threa... or ITC Secure's itc secure fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mxdr with pulse portal visibility, service re....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers | Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Daylight SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | ITC SecureTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft Defender for EndpointPalo Alto Cortex XDRVMware Carbon Black Cloud | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkIBM QRadarCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEMCoralogixDatadogElasticGoogle ChroniclePantherSumo Logic Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤15 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user per-month subscription with contract term discounts | Custom quote. ITC Secure does not publish MXDR powered by Pulse package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No breach warranty offered. If warranty coverage matters for your risk calculus, this is a gap.. 36-month contracts offer deeper discounts but lock you into a company with under two years of operating history.. No FedRAMP authorization. Not a fit for federal workloads requiring FedRAMP. | Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. ITC Secure publishes broad MXDR components, including endpoint, identity, Office 365, cloud apps, storage, vulnerability management and OT. Buyers should confirm which components are included in their quote.. Public pages do not define default response authority, so containment permissions and approval rules should be written into the contract.. Incident response is listed as a separate service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MXDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | 12 months, 24 months, 36 months | Custom, MXDR powered by Pulse, Managed services, Incident Response |
| Channels | SlackTeamsEmailPortal | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEurope | |
| Onboarding | Under 1 hour | Not published. ITC Secure publishes security engineering and SOC onboarding as a build-and-deploy service, but no standard MXDR implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesProfessional Services | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Public Gartner Peer Insights pages show a 5.0 average for Daylight Security as of May 2026, but review volume is still light compared to established MDR vendors. Coverage on G2 and PeerSpot is thin, and Reddit presence is minimal. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on ITC Secure's Microsoft focus, Microsoft Verified Managed XDR status, Pulse portal, long managed-service history and broad MXDR service components. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, SOC operating model and exact component inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001:2022 | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1 |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (AICPA, 31 March 2025)ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (IQNET, 14 December 2025) | Microsoft Verified Managed XDRMicrosoft Solutions Partner in SecurityMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Modern WorkMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Infrastructure AzureMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationCyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1ISO/IEC 27001Great Place to Work Certification |
| Founded | 2024 | – |
| Data retention | 90 days, with optional agentic security data lake | Not published. ITC Secure says Pulse provides visibility into customer security posture, activities, incident trends, Microsoft license consumption and service metrics. No standard public MXDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Daylight Security and ITC Secure?
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Daylight Security offers ≤15 minutes, ITC Secure offers Not disclosed. Daylight Security covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for ITC Secure.
How do Daylight Security and ITC Secure differ in response capabilities?
Daylight Security supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. ITC Secure supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Daylight Security and not included with ITC Secure.
How does Daylight Security pricing compare to ITC Secure?
Daylight Security pricing: Not published. ITC Secure pricing: Not published. Watch for with Daylight Security: No breach warranty offered. If warranty coverage matters for your risk calculus, this is a gap.; 36-month contracts offer deeper discounts but lock you into a company with under two years of operating history.. Watch for with ITC Secure: Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison..
Should I choose Daylight Security or ITC Secure?
Choose Daylight Security if: mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers. Choose ITC Secure if: microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform. Daylight Security is not ideal for risk-averse organizations requiring a multi-year proven operational track record and broad independent review coverage. ITC Secure is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.