Integrity360 vs Tesorion
Integrity360 and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Integrity360 targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Integrity360 and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Integrity360 targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Integrity360TECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Custom quotes only. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint pricing. No SIEM ingestion fees. Custom quotes based on environment size. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Darktrace NDR integration requires separate Darktrace licensing, not included in MDR pricing. Technology-agnostic model means the customer must own their own EDR/XDR licenses separately. Extended log storage is an add-on, default retention period not published. The 1-hour response commitment requires a separate IR retainer purchase on top of the base MDR service | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfricaNorth America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Approximately 6 weeks for core MDR. Includes log source integration, detection rule tuning, and honeypot deployment. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentInsuranceRetailTelecommunications | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Representative Vendor in 5 Market Guides and holds SOC 2 Type II, CREST, and ISO 27001 certifications. Virtually no customer reviews exist on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights, making independent sentiment verification impossible. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701CREST CSIRCREST Penetration Testing | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701CREST Cyber Security Incident ResponseCREST Penetration TestingMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2005 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published. Extended log storage available as add-on. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Integrity360 and Tesorion?
Integrity360 is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Integrity360 and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Integrity360 supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Integrity360 and not included with Tesorion.
How does Integrity360 pricing compare to Tesorion?
Integrity360 pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Integrity360: Darktrace NDR integration requires separate Darktrace licensing, not included in MDR pricing; Technology-agnostic model means the customer must own their own EDR/XDR licenses separately. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Integrity360 or Tesorion?
Choose Integrity360 if: european mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Integrity360 is not ideal for organizations wanting a single-vendor platform where EDR and MDR come from the same provider. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.