Innofactor MDRaaS vs SecurityHQ
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. SecurityHQ is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; SecurityHQ serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Innofactor MDRaaS includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud), compared to 3 for SecurityHQ (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. SecurityHQ is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; SecurityHQ serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Innofactor MDRaaS includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud), compared to 3 for SecurityHQ (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Innofactor MDRaaS (Microsoft-ecosystem) and SecurityHQ (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Innofactor MDRaaS's innofactor mdraas fits microsoft-heavy nordic buyers that want sentinel-based monitoring while ke... or SecurityHQ's the core draw is keeping your existing edr stack while adding soc analyst coverage, backed by a c....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel | Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 1/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Innofactor MDRaaSTECH-AGNOSTIC | SecurityHQTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | IBM QRadar |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: Optional add-onCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Approval Required |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | + Optional |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | ≤15 minutes |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered custom quote. Innofactor publishes Basic, Standard and Advanced MDRaaS tiers, each marked ask for pricing. | Custom pricing based on environment size, data volume and services required. Available through AWS Marketplace with private offers. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.. Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Public pages do not publish named response actions or response SLAs.. Customers keep ownership of logs and incidents, so internal responsibility for mitigation should be clear before signing. | IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.. No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales.. Identity monitoring and SaaS coverage are scoped separately, which could increase costs significantly depending on your environment.. Multi-year contracts are typical in the MSSP market. Ask about early termination terms and auto-renewal clauses. |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Tier1 Basic, Tier2 Standard, Tier3 Advanced, Custom | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPhonePortal | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | EuropeMiddle EastNorth AmericaAPACAfrica |
| Onboarding | Innofactor says the core infrastructure resides in the customer's Azure cloud environment and needs no on-premises infrastructure. It describes deployment as rapid and light, but does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Public SectorFinancial ServicesTechnology | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyManufacturing |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Innofactor has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Nordic Microsoft expertise, Sentinel in the customer's Azure environment, tiered service levels and clear customer control of logs and incidents. Buyers should validate response authority, total licensing cost, add-on scope and Tier3 operating model before signing. | Thin public review presence compared to larger MDR vendors. MITRE 2024 managed services evaluation showed strong detection with low alert noise. IDC MarketScape Leader for Middle East MDR in 2024 and 2025. Technology-agnostic approach appeals to customers with existing EDR investments, but no published pricing and few customer references make independent evaluation difficult. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 13485AQAP-2110ISO 14001 | ISO 27001CREST |
| Certifications | ISO 9001:2015ISO 13485:2016ISO/IEC 27001:2022AQAP-2110ISO 14001:2015Microsoft Solution Partner designationsMicrosoft Advanced Specializations | ISO 27001CREST SOC Accreditation |
| Founded | 2000 | 2003 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. Innofactor says logs and incidents remain in the customer's own Azure environment. | Not published. Varies by SIEM deployment and customer contract. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Innofactor MDRaaS and SecurityHQ?
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SecurityHQ is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Innofactor MDRaaS offers Not disclosed, SecurityHQ offers ≤15 minutes. Innofactor MDRaaS covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for SecurityHQ.
How do Innofactor MDRaaS and SecurityHQ differ in response capabilities?
Innofactor MDRaaS supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. SecurityHQ supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Incident response is not included with Innofactor MDRaaS and included with SecurityHQ.
How does Innofactor MDRaaS pricing compare to SecurityHQ?
Innofactor MDRaaS pricing: Not published. SecurityHQ pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Innofactor MDRaaS: Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.; Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Watch for with SecurityHQ: IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.; No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales..
Should I choose Innofactor MDRaaS or SecurityHQ?
Choose Innofactor MDRaaS if: nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel. Choose SecurityHQ if: mid-market and enterprise organizations committed to existing EDR platforms who want SOC expertise without rip-and-replace. Innofactor MDRaaS is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before sales engagement. SecurityHQ is not ideal for teams wanting transparent pricing and published SLA credits upfront.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.