Huntress vs Todyl: MDR Comparison 2026
Huntress (MSP-channel) and Todyl (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Huntress requires its own security platform, while Todyl requires its own security platform. Huntress targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Todyl focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Huntress includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 5 for Todyl (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Huntress vs Todyl: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Choose Todyl if:
- •MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management
- •SMBs with lean security teams wanting a dedicated security contact (DRAM) at an accessible price point
- •Greenfield deployments with no existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments to preserve
- •You need Cloud and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: Huntress (MSP-channel) and Todyl (MDR provider) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Huntress's the msp community's gold standard for smb-focused mdr or Todyl's sase, edr, siem, mxdr, soar, and grc in a single agent with a dedicated dram per customer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Huntress and Todyl?
Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Todyl is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Huntress covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Todyl.
How do Huntress and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Huntress pricing compare to Todyl?
Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published.. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in -- must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base -- unclear what modules are included at that tier.
Should I choose Huntress or Todyl?
Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Choose Todyl if: mSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management. Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle. Todyl is not ideal for organizations with existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments -- requires full Todyl stack adoption.