Choose Huntress or Todyl
Choose Huntress if
- MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- SMBs needing affordable MDR with minimal overhead, deploys in 30 minutes
- Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace environments needing identity threat detection alongside endpoint coverage
Choose Todyl if
- MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform
- SMBs with lean security teams wanting a dedicated DRAM at an accessible price
- Greenfield deployments with no existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments to preserve
- You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
- You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
What’s actually different
Buyer brief
Updated 2026-10-09
Fit. Huntress and Todyl both sell to MSPs and SMBs, but they solve different problems. Huntress is a modular security platform: Managed EDR, ITDR, SIEM, security awareness training and ISPM are priced separately. Todyl is a consolidation platform that tries to replace SASE, EDR, SIEM, MXDR, SOAR and GRC with one stack.
Response. For pure MDR buying, Huntress is the more validated and easier-to-understand option. MSP community feedback is strong, G2 volume is high, deployment is fast, and Huntress publishes its list prices, with Managed EDR at $8.99/endpoint/month ($7.99 at 100 endpoints). That price is EDR-only, and identity, SIEM and training are priced separately.
Cost and scope. Todyl's appeal is tool consolidation. A dedicated DRAM works with the customer during incidents through Slack or Teams, and the platform covers more surfaces in one package. But the public starting price of $250/month is a base platform signal, not a clean MXDR quote. Leaving Todyl can also be harder because it may mean replacing several security functions at once. Choose Huntress if you want proven MSP-first MDR with less platform disruption. Choose Todyl if your main pain is tool sprawl and you are comfortable adopting one vendor for most of the stack. Do not compare Huntress EDR pricing directly against Todyl's platform starting price; they are not the same scope.
FAQ
What is the main difference between Huntress and Todyl?
Huntress is an MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Todyl is an MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Huntress covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Todyl.
How do Huntress and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
Huntress supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Huntress pricing compare to Todyl?
Huntress pricing: Managed EDR $8.99/endpoint/month MSRP, $7.99 at 100 endpoints (vendor-published). ITDR, SIEM, SAT and ISPM are priced separately. (50-seat minimum). Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published. Watch for with Huntress: 50-seat minimum per product for direct and reseller purchases; no Huntress minimum when buying through an MSP; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT, ISPM) is priced separately, so full-stack cost is the sum of the products in use. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in, must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base, unclear what modules are included at that tier.