Huntress vs Sophos: MDR Comparison 2026
Huntress (MSP-channel) and Sophos (Services firm) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Huntress requires its own security platform, while Sophos works with your existing tools. Huntress targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Sophos focuses on SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Huntress includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 5 for Sophos (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Huntress vs Sophos: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Choose Sophos if:
- •SMBs and mid-market organizations seeking an all-in-one MDR with inclusive IR
- •Organizations with diverse, multi-vendor security stacks needing broad integration support
- •Companies wanting straightforward pricing with predictable costs
- •You need Network and OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Sophos offers one, Huntress does not)
Bottom line: Huntress is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Sophos is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Huntress and Sophos?
Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Sophos is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Huntress offers Not disclosed, Sophos offers ≤15 minutes. Huntress covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Sophos.
How do Huntress and Sophos differ in response capabilities?
Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Sophos supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Huntress and included with Sophos.
How does Huntress pricing compare to Sophos?
Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Sophos pricing: Custom quote required; tiered pricing bands (10-24, 25-49, 50-99, etc.) (10-seat minimum). Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up. Watch for with Sophos: MDR Essentials does NOT include breach warranty or full incident response — those require MDR Complete; Linux server protection requires separate Sophos Workload Protection subscription.
Should I choose Huntress or Sophos?
Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Choose Sophos if: sMBs and mid-market organizations seeking an all-in-one MDR with inclusive IR. Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle. Sophos is not ideal for large enterprises needing deep, custom detection engineering.