Huntress vs N-able: MDR Comparison 2026
Huntress and N-able are both categorized as MSP-channels, but differ in execution. Huntress requires its own security platform and targets SMB and Mid-market organizations. N-able works with your existing tools and focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Huntress includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 5 for N-able (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Huntress vs N-able: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Choose N-able if:
- •MSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA
- •SMBs and mid-market needing breach warranty protection
- •Organizations wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that works with existing EDR
- •You need Cloud and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (N-able offers one, Huntress does not)
Bottom line: Huntress is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. N-able is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Huntress and N-able?
Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). N-able is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Huntress covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for N-able.
How do Huntress and N-able differ in response capabilities?
Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. N-able supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Huntress and included with N-able.
How does Huntress pricing compare to N-able?
Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). N-able pricing: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs including MDR. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up. Watch for with N-able: Pricing designed for MSP channel; direct pricing may differ; MDR Base is identity-focused only; Complete needed for full coverage.
Should I choose Huntress or N-able?
Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Choose N-able if: mSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA. Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle. N-able is not ideal for large enterprises with existing SOC infrastructure.