Devoteam vs TrustNet GhostWatch
Devoteam and TrustNet GhostWatch are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Devoteam targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while TrustNet GhostWatch serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Devoteam and TrustNet GhostWatch are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Devoteam targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while TrustNet GhostWatch serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm | SaaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SaaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DevoteamTECH-AGNOSTIC | TrustNet GhostWatchTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft security toolsCustomer endpoint security tools | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platformsGoogle Security Operations | GhostWatch integrated SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | ContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote for cloud managed services and managed security. Public MDR prices are not published. | Custom quote. TrustNet publishes flexible service tiers and says GhostWatch is available for an affordable fixed monthly fee, but no public managed-security price list was found. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs.. The service is cloud-centered; teams seeking a packaged endpoint MDR with named containment actions should validate endpoint tooling and response scope.. Devoteam has separate cloud, cybersecurity, Microsoft, AWS and Google Cloud offerings, so scope boundaries between MDR, cloud managed services and advisory work should be written into the contract.. Offboarding terms for SIEM detections, automation scripts, reports and retained logs are not described publicly. | TrustNet is compliance-heavy, so buyers should separate MDR and managed security operations cost from audit and advisory work.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named containment actions.. Endpoint coverage is less explicit than network, cloud, SIEM and vulnerability management coverage.. GhostWatch and TrustNet pages use both managed security and MDR language, so buyers should confirm exact service obligations in the order form. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom cloud managed services engagement, Managed Security, Cloud Managed Services, Managed Detection and Response | Custom, Monthly |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeMEA | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Devoteam describes SIEM platform design and implementation, Infrastructure as Code deployment and managed cloud/security operations, but no standard MDR onboarding timeline. | TrustNet says GhostWatch begins monitoring immediately after rapid deployment, with assessment and alignment before onboarding. A public standard onboarding timeline was not found. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailTelecommunicationsManufacturingPublic SectorHealthcare | SaaSHealthcareRetailFinancial ServicesTechnologyCompliance-heavy organizations |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Devoteam has solid vendor-controlled evidence for cloud MDR, 24x7 monitoring, Sentinel-centered SIEM operations, SOAR automation and multi-cloud security partnerships. Independent MDR-specific buyer reviews are limited, so buyers should validate SOC delivery quality, response authority, cloud log costs and actual managed-service boundaries through references. | GhostWatch has limited MDR-specific community signal. TrustNet's public story is strongest around compliance, audits, MDR and managed security rather than independent MDR benchmarks. Treat buyer diligence as a service-scope exercise: verify response authority, telemetry sources and the split between security operations and compliance services. |
| Compliance | GDPRPCI DSSANSSICloud Security AllianceISO | SOC 2PCI DSSISO 27001HIPAAHITRUSTGDPRCCPACMMCNIST CSF |
| Certifications | AWS Premier Consulting PartnerAWS Managed Services ProviderGoogle Cloud Diamond PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Security Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Security Services Specialized partnerMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Azure Expert MSP | PCI QSA |
| Founded | – | 2003 |
| Data retention | Not published for MDR. Devoteam describes outsourced SIEM platform operations and cloud-managed services, but public pages do not publish default log retention, hot/warm storage or export terms. | Not published as a standard GhostWatch retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Devoteam and TrustNet GhostWatch?
Devoteam is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). TrustNet GhostWatch is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Devoteam and TrustNet GhostWatch differ in response capabilities?
Devoteam supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. TrustNet GhostWatch supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does Devoteam pricing compare to TrustNet GhostWatch?
Devoteam pricing: Not published. TrustNet GhostWatch pricing: Not published. Watch for with Devoteam: Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs.. Watch for with TrustNet GhostWatch: TrustNet is compliance-heavy, so buyers should separate MDR and managed security operations cost from audit and advisory work.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named containment actions..
Should I choose Devoteam or TrustNet GhostWatch?
Choose Devoteam if: european and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm. Choose TrustNet GhostWatch if: saaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work. Devoteam is not ideal for buyers that require public per-endpoint MDR pricing before sales engagement. TrustNet GhostWatch is not ideal for buyers that need a pure-play MDR provider with published endpoint isolation and account containment actions.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.