AhnLab vs TrustNet GhostWatch
AhnLab is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. TrustNet GhostWatch is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. AhnLab targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; TrustNet GhostWatch serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. AhnLab includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch (Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
AhnLab is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. TrustNet GhostWatch is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. AhnLab targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; TrustNet GhostWatch serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. AhnLab includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch (Cloud, Network).
AhnLab is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. TrustNet GhostWatch is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | South Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR | SaaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- South Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SaaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | AhnLabPLATFORM | TrustNet GhostWatchTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | AhnLab EDR | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | GhostWatch integrated SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContain | ContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Based on the number of AhnLab EDR agents installed. AhnLab says EDR Premium includes the EDR license fee and that service cost requires a separate inquiry. | Custom quote. TrustNet publishes flexible service tiers and says GhostWatch is available for an affordable fixed monthly fee, but no public managed-security price list was found. |
| Hidden cost warnings | The service is tied to AhnLab's endpoint stack, so buyers with existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender or SentinelOne deployments should price migration and overlap.. AhnLab separates basic MDR from paid EDR Premium. Buyers should confirm which response actions are included in each tier.. Public materials do not disclose minimum seats, regional availability, SLA terms or retained-forensics scope.. Fuller cross-domain detection may require AhnLab XDR, TIP, MDS, cloud or CPS products outside endpoint MDR. | TrustNet is compliance-heavy, so buyers should separate MDR and managed security operations cost from audit and advisory work.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named containment actions.. Endpoint coverage is less explicit than network, cloud, SIEM and vulnerability management coverage.. GhostWatch and TrustNet pages use both managed security and MDR language, so buyers should confirm exact service obligations in the order form. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Per EDR agent, Custom quote, EDR Premium paid tier | Custom, Monthly |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | APAC | North America |
| Onboarding | Requires AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR plus external transmission of AhnLab EDR detection logs. Public materials do not publish a standard onboarding timeline. | TrustNet says GhostWatch begins monitoring immediately after rapid deployment, with assessment and alignment before onboarding. A public standard onboarding timeline was not found. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesManufacturingGovernmentHealthcare | SaaSHealthcareRetailFinancial ServicesTechnologyCompliance-heavy organizations |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | AhnLab has stronger public proof around endpoint products than around MDR delivery. English-language MDR-specific buyer reviews are sparse, so buyers should validate analyst quality, escalation process and regional support through references. | GhostWatch has limited MDR-specific community signal. TrustNet's public story is strongest around compliance, audits, MDR and managed security rather than independent MDR benchmarks. Treat buyer diligence as a service-scope exercise: verify response authority, telemetry sources and the split between security operations and compliance services. |
| Compliance | MITRE ATT&CK evaluationsSE Labs Advanced Security Test | SOC 2PCI DSSISO 27001HIPAAHITRUSTGDPRCCPACMMCNIST CSF |
| Certifications | SE Labs AAA rating for AhnLab EPP/EDRMITRE ATT&CK Evaluations Round 7 participant | PCI QSA |
| Founded | 1995 | 2003 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. AhnLab EDR collects endpoint behavior, file, registry, network, process, system and Windows event-log data for analysis in EDR Analyzer. | Not published as a standard GhostWatch retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between AhnLab and TrustNet GhostWatch?
AhnLab is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). TrustNet GhostWatch is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). AhnLab covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch.
How do AhnLab and TrustNet GhostWatch differ in response capabilities?
AhnLab supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. TrustNet GhostWatch supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does AhnLab pricing compare to TrustNet GhostWatch?
AhnLab pricing: Not published. TrustNet GhostWatch pricing: Not published. Watch for with AhnLab: The service is tied to AhnLab's endpoint stack, so buyers with existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender or SentinelOne deployments should price migration and overlap.; AhnLab separates basic MDR from paid EDR Premium. Buyers should confirm which response actions are included in each tier.. Watch for with TrustNet GhostWatch: TrustNet is compliance-heavy, so buyers should separate MDR and managed security operations cost from audit and advisory work.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named containment actions..
Should I choose AhnLab or TrustNet GhostWatch?
Choose AhnLab if: south Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR. Choose TrustNet GhostWatch if: saaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work. AhnLab is not ideal for buyers that want MDR layered on top of existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, SentinelOne or other endpoint tools. TrustNet GhostWatch is not ideal for buyers that need a pure-play MDR provider with published endpoint isolation and account containment actions.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.