Defendable vs WithSecure
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. WithSecure is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; WithSecure serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. WithSecure is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; WithSecure serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
WithSecure is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Defendable is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | European mid-market organizations prioritizing EU data residency, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European mid-market organizations prioritizing EU data residency, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | WithSecurePLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | WithSecure Elements EDR (required for MDR service) |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel (native Azure Marketplace connector)Any SIEM via Elements Connector (Syslog forwarding) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantine |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Custom quotes required. Described as 'competitively priced for mid-sized businesses.' ITPro rated pricing 5/5 stars. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Identity | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Per-endpoint/per-device/per-user subscription. Monthly or annual billing options. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Platform lock-in: requires WithSecure Elements EDR, cannot use competing EDR. Modular pricing: full coverage across identity, cloud, SaaS, and exposure management adds cost beyond base MDR. Ownership transition: being taken private by CVC/Siilasmaa, managed services ARR declined 22% in H1 2025 |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not publicly disclosed. Requires Elements EDR deployment first, then MDR subscription activated in Elements Security Center. |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesManufacturingHealthcareGovernmentEducationTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published. Marketing states 'reaction in minutes, containment within hours.' PeerSpot reviewer reported ~4 minute average alert response (anecdotal). |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | PeerSpot 8.0/10 with 100% recommend rate and growing mindshare (0.3% to 1.0% YoY). Gartner Peer Insights 4.5/5 across 144 reviews (all products). Forrester Strong Performer in MDR Europe Q3 2025. Being taken private by CVC/Siilasmaa (delisting expected H1 2026). Consulting divested to Neqst May 2025. Managed services ARR declined 22% in H1 2025. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 (SOC 2 Type 2 equivalent)GDPRNIS2DORA |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | ISO 27001 (cloud-delivered products and managed security services)ISAE 3000 (assurance-based, SOC 2 Type 2 equivalent)CREST-Accredited CSIR TeamNCSC CIR Level 1 (one of only 9 IR teams globally for Category 1-3 incidents)NCSC CIR Level 2 (via CREST)BSI (German Federal Office for Information Security) Assured IR TeamForrester Strong Performer MDR Europe Q3 2025Gartner Magic Quadrant for Endpoint Protection Platforms 2024AV-TEST Approved Advanced EDR 2024MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations Enterprise 2024 Participant |
| Founded | 2020 | 1988 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | 13-14 months for security events, varying by event severity. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and WithSecure?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). WithSecure is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack).
How do Defendable and WithSecure differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. WithSecure supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Defendable and included with WithSecure.
How does Defendable pricing compare to WithSecure?
Defendable pricing: Not published. WithSecure pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Custom quotes required. Described as 'competitively priced for mid-sized businesses.' ITPro rated pricing 5/5 stars.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with WithSecure: Platform lock-in: requires WithSecure Elements EDR, cannot use competing EDR; Modular pricing: full coverage across identity, cloud, SaaS, and exposure management adds cost beyond base MDR.
Should I choose Defendable or WithSecure?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose WithSecure if: european mid-market organizations prioritizing EU data residency, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. WithSecure is not ideal for organizations committed to multi-vendor or BYO-EDR strategies (requires WithSecure agent).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.