Defendable vs TrustNet GhostWatch
Defendable and TrustNet GhostWatch are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while TrustNet GhostWatch serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch (Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable and TrustNet GhostWatch are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while TrustNet GhostWatch serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch (Cloud, Network).
TrustNet GhostWatch offers broader coverage (2 surfaces vs. 1). Defendable may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | SaaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SaaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | TrustNet GhostWatchTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | GhostWatch integrated SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | ContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom quote. TrustNet publishes flexible service tiers and says GhostWatch is available for an affordable fixed monthly fee, but no public managed-security price list was found. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | TrustNet is compliance-heavy, so buyers should separate MDR and managed security operations cost from audit and advisory work.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named containment actions.. Endpoint coverage is less explicit than network, cloud, SIEM and vulnerability management coverage.. GhostWatch and TrustNet pages use both managed security and MDR language, so buyers should confirm exact service obligations in the order form. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Custom, Monthly |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | TrustNet says GhostWatch begins monitoring immediately after rapid deployment, with assessment and alignment before onboarding. A public standard onboarding timeline was not found. |
| Industry focus | Not published | SaaSHealthcareRetailFinancial ServicesTechnologyCompliance-heavy organizations |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | GhostWatch has limited MDR-specific community signal. TrustNet's public story is strongest around compliance, audits, MDR and managed security rather than independent MDR benchmarks. Treat buyer diligence as a service-scope exercise: verify response authority, telemetry sources and the split between security operations and compliance services. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2PCI DSSISO 27001HIPAAHITRUSTGDPRCCPACMMCNIST CSF |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | PCI QSA |
| Founded | 2020 | 2003 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published as a standard GhostWatch retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and TrustNet GhostWatch?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). TrustNet GhostWatch is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch.
How do Defendable and TrustNet GhostWatch differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. TrustNet GhostWatch supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to TrustNet GhostWatch?
Defendable pricing: Not published. TrustNet GhostWatch pricing: Not published. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with TrustNet GhostWatch: TrustNet is compliance-heavy, so buyers should separate MDR and managed security operations cost from audit and advisory work.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named containment actions..
Should I choose Defendable or TrustNet GhostWatch?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose TrustNet GhostWatch if: saaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. TrustNet GhostWatch is not ideal for buyers that need a pure-play MDR provider with published endpoint isolation and account containment actions.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.