Defendable vs Todyl
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Todyl is a MSP-channel that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl serves SMB and Mid-market. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Todyl (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Todyl is a MSP-channel that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl serves SMB and Mid-market. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Todyl (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Todyl is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Defendable is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform |
| Price | Custom quote | Base platform from $250/mo; MXDR pricing unpublished |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform
- Price
- Base platform from $250/mo; MXDR pricing unpublished
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | TodylPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Todyl Endpoint Security (native, required, Elastic-based) |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Todyl Cloud-Managed SIEM (native) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Three-tier packaging (Essentials, Advanced, Complete) launched September 2025. Platform subscription starting at $250/month. Per-tier pricing not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Platform-native lock-in, must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE. $250/month starting price is the base, unclear what modules are included at that tier. EDR is Elastic-based, not Todyl proprietary, custom rules layer on top of Elastic |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | SlackTeamsPortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Industry focus | Not published | MSP/ChannelHealthcareGovernmentEducationFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | G2 4.6/5 (93 reviews). Software Finder 4.9/5 (14 reviews). PeerSpot listed but minimal reviews. MSP press is positive about tool consolidation. Limited independent buyer validation compared to established MDR vendors. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2 (infrastructure providers, not Todyl directly)ISO 27001 (infrastructure providers, not Todyl directly) |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | – |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Up to 5 years searchable SIEM storage (configurable by tier) |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Todyl?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Todyl is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Todyl.
How do Defendable and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Todyl?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in, must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base, unclear what modules are included at that tier.
Should I choose Defendable or Todyl?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Todyl if: mSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Todyl is not ideal for organizations with existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments (requires full Todyl stack adoption).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.