Defendable vs Eye Security
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Eye Security is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Eye Security serves SMB and Mid-market. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for Eye Security (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Eye Security is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Eye Security serves SMB and Mid-market. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for Eye Security (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Defendable (Services firm) and Eye Security (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly... or Eye Security's european mdr with intelligence-agency pedigree and an optional cyber insurance bundle through eye....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | European mid-market organizations (50-1000 employees) wanting MDR with optional cyber insurance in one vendor |
| Price | Custom quote | From EUR 8.99/endpoint/mo |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European mid-market organizations (50-1000 employees) wanting MDR with optional cyber insurance in one vendor
- Price
- From EUR 8.99/endpoint/mo
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | Eye SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | EUR 8.99+/endpoint/month (varies by deployment size and coverage scope) |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Per-endpoint pricing starting at EUR 8.99/endpoint/month |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Europe-only coverage (Netherlands, Germany, Belgium). No North American or APAC presence.. Pricing in euros only. Three editions but per-tier pricing beyond the base rate is not published.. Insurance is only in the top tier (Cyber Guard Insured), not all plans. If you want the insurance bundle, expect higher cost.. Young company (founded 2020) with limited public reviews. Harder to validate claims than established providers. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | 2 days (software rollout), monitoring live within hours |
| Industry focus | Not published | AutomotiveManufacturingHealthcareFinancial ServicesInformation Technology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Very limited public reviews. TrustPilot shows 4 stars from 3 reviews. No PeerSpot (0.3% mindshare, 0 reviews), G2 or Gartner Peer Insights reviews found. No Reddit discussions. Founded in 2020 with strong VC backing (Bessemer, J.P. Morgan) and intelligence pedigree, but almost no independent practitioner validation in English. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | GDPRNIS2 |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | – |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published. If data resides in customer's Microsoft Sentinel tenant, retention depends on tenant configuration. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Eye Security?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Eye Security is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Eye Security.
How do Defendable and Eye Security differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Eye Security supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Defendable and included with Eye Security.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Eye Security?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Eye Security pricing: EUR 8.99+/endpoint/month (varies by deployment size and coverage scope). Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Eye Security: Europe-only coverage (Netherlands, Germany, Belgium). No North American or APAC presence.; Pricing in euros only. Three editions but per-tier pricing beyond the base rate is not published..
Should I choose Defendable or Eye Security?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Eye Security if: european mid-market organizations (50-1000 employees) wanting MDR with optional cyber insurance in one vendor. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Eye Security is not ideal for north American or APAC organizations. Eye Security only operates in Europe..
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.