Lumifi vs ThreatDown: MDR comparison 2026
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. ThreatDown is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Lumifi targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; ThreatDown serves SMB and Mid-market. Lumifi includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Lumifi if:
- •SMB and mid-market teams wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that wraps around their existing EDR
- •Organizations that need security data to stay in their own environment for compliance or policy reasons
- •Healthcare and government buyers looking for specialized MDR with industry-specific detection
- •You need Cloud and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with OneView multi-tenant console and RMM integrations
- •Environments prioritizing ransomware protection with 7-day rollback capability
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Lumifi is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Lumifi and ThreatDown?
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Lumifi covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do Lumifi and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
Lumifi supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable.
How does Lumifi pricing compare to ThreatDown?
Lumifi pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Requires a sales conversation.. ThreatDown pricing: MDR at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with Lumifi: Co-managed model requires your team to handle parts of remediation, which means staffing costs on your side; SIEM licensing (EventTracker or third-party) may be separate from the MDR contract. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage, no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in, cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose Lumifi or ThreatDown?
Choose Lumifi if: sMB and mid-market teams wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that wraps around their existing EDR. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing. Lumifi is not ideal for buyers who require independent analyst validation or MITRE-tested detection claims. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network).