Arctic Wolf vs ThreatDown: MDR Comparison 2026
Arctic Wolf (Pure-play MDR) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Arctic Wolf works with your existing tools, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform. Arctic Wolf targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatDown focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Arctic Wolf includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Arctic Wolf vs ThreatDown: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Arctic Wolf if:
- •Mid-market organizations (50-1000 employees) without a dedicated SOC
- •IT generalists overwhelmed by managing multiple security point solutions
- •Organizations wanting a technology-agnostic MDR that works with existing tools
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Arctic Wolf offers one, ThreatDown does not)
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Arctic Wolf is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Arctic Wolf and ThreatDown?
Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Arctic Wolf offers ≤1 hour, ThreatDown offers Not disclosed. Arctic Wolf covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do Arctic Wolf and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
Arctic Wolf supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable.
How does Arctic Wolf pricing compare to ThreatDown?
Arctic Wolf pricing: Starting ~$20/user/month; MDR Basic ~$44,000/year for up to 100 users. Enterprise pricing is custom.. ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with Arctic Wolf: Incident response and remediation is guided, not performed on your behalf — may need separate IR retainer; Normalized data and active threat feed not directly accessible to customers — security operates as a 'black box' for some. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose Arctic Wolf or ThreatDown?
Choose Arctic Wolf if: mid-market organizations (50-1000 employees) without a dedicated SOC. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). Arctic Wolf is not ideal for large enterprises requiring deep data access and custom detection engineering. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT).