Cynet vs Tesorion
Cynet is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cynet targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cynet includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Cynet is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cynet targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cynet includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Cynet is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Tesorion is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market organizations with small security teams wanting maximum coverage from a single platform | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | $7-10/endpoint/mo | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market organizations with small security teams wanting maximum coverage from a single platform
- Price
- $7-10/endpoint/mo
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CynetPLATFORM | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Cynet 360 | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Syslog export to external SIEM | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | $7-10/endpoint/month depending on tier. Elite is $7/endpoint/month (EPP+EDR+CyOps MDR). All-in-One is $10/endpoint/month (adds NDR, UEBA, Deception, SOAR, SSPM). Verified on cynet.com/packages. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | 20 | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint monthly subscription with published pricing on website | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | 20-endpoint minimum ($140/month floor for Elite, $200/month for All-in-One). 1-year auto-renewing contracts standard, combined with platform lock-in makes exit disruptive. Requires replacing existing EDR with Cynet agent, significant migration effort if already deployed on CrowdStrike/SentinelOne/Defender. DFIR not included. Full incident response is a separate paid engagement.. 90-day standard data retention. Longer retention requires exporting to an external SIEM at your own cost.. No breach warranty offered | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Hours to days depending on environment size. Single lightweight agent. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesTechnology/SaaSProfessional ServicesManufacturing | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Sub-5 minutes (vendor-claimed internal benchmark, not independently validated) | Not published |
| MTTR | Sub-10 minutes (vendor-claimed internal benchmark, not independently validated) | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (139+ reviews across markets), VoC Strong Performer for XDR 2025 and EPP 2026. PeerSpot 8.8/10 (97% recommend). Praised for all-in-one simplicity and transparent pricing. Not included in Gartner MQ or Forrester Wave, limiting enterprise credibility. Small company (~260-320 employees, $21M revenue in 2024) raises long-term viability questions. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001 | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001ISO 27032 | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Data retention | 90 days standard. Syslog export to any external SIEM for extended retention. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Cynet and Tesorion?
Cynet is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cynet covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Cynet and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Cynet supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Cynet pricing compare to Tesorion?
Cynet pricing: $7-10/endpoint/month depending on tier. Elite is $7/endpoint/month (EPP+EDR+CyOps MDR). All-in-One is $10/endpoint/month (adds NDR, UEBA, Deception, SOAR, SSPM). Verified on cynet.com/packages. (20-seat minimum). Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cynet: 20-endpoint minimum ($140/month floor for Elite, $200/month for All-in-One); 1-year auto-renewing contracts standard, combined with platform lock-in makes exit disruptive. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Cynet or Tesorion?
Choose Cynet if: sMB and mid-market organizations with small security teams wanting maximum coverage from a single platform. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Cynet is not ideal for large enterprises with existing CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender deployments since Cynet requires replacing your EDR. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.