Cyderes vs Defendable
Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyderes targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyderes includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for Defendable (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyderes targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyderes includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for Defendable (Endpoint).
Cyderes (Pure-play MDR) and Defendable (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyderes's technology-agnostic mdr built on google chronicle with deep identity security integrations and th... or Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyderesTECH-AGNOSTIC | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneCybereasonPalo Alto CortexMalwarebytes Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Google ChronicleSplunk Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not publicly disclosed. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote-based, not publicly disclosed | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing at all. Expect an enterprise sales process with no self-serve benchmarks.. Google Chronicle license may be billed separately depending on delivery model. Clarify before signing.. DFIR is always a separate retainer, not included in base MDR.. Identity-first approach may require upfront IAM assessment and remediation work before MDR is fully operational. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Varies by environment. One enterprise case study references a 6-month parallel migration. Smaller deployments likely faster, but no published timeline. | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. |
| Industry focus | Healthcare & Life SciencesFinancial ServicesGaming & EntertainmentRetailLegal ServicesManufacturingPharmaceutical/Biotech | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 5.0/5 from a single review. No G2 or Capterra listings. PeerSpot ranks #41 in MDR with 0 collected reviews. Glassdoor 3.2/5. Virtually no independent customer validation despite analyst recognition. | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2ISO 27001 | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response |
| Certifications | SOC 2ISO 27001 | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified |
| Founded | 2003 | 2020 |
| Data retention | Data stored in Google Chronicle/BigQuery. Retention periods customizable per contract. Chronicle provides 12 months of hot data by default. | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyderes and Defendable?
Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyderes covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Defendable.
How do Cyderes and Defendable differ in response capabilities?
Cyderes supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Cyderes pricing compare to Defendable?
Cyderes pricing: Not publicly disclosed.. Defendable pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyderes: No public pricing at all. Expect an enterprise sales process with no self-serve benchmarks.; Google Chronicle license may be billed separately depending on delivery model. Clarify before signing.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published..
Should I choose Cyderes or Defendable?
Choose Cyderes if: google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR. Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Cyderes is not ideal for sMBs or buyers needing transparent, published pricing. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.