Ackcent Cybersecurity vs Cyderes
Ackcent Cybersecurity and Cyderes are both Pure-play MDRs that work with your existing tools. Ackcent Cybersecurity targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Cyderes serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Ackcent Cybersecurity and Cyderes are both Pure-play MDRs that work with your existing tools. Ackcent Cybersecurity targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Cyderes serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European or LATAM mid-market companies that want a boutique provider with native Spanish and English support | Google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European or LATAM mid-market companies that want a boutique provider with native Spanish and English support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Ackcent CybersecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | CyderesTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | BlackBerry Cylance SentinelOne | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderCybereasonPalo Alto CortexMalwarebytes SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Stellar Cyber Open XDR | Google ChronicleMicrosoft SentinelSplunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantine | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote only. No published pricing or pricing calculator. | Custom quote-based, not publicly disclosed |
| Hidden cost warnings | Advisory, Red Team, AppSec, and Training services are separate from base MDR. No public pricing makes cost comparison impossible without direct sales engagement. Breach and Attack Simulation (AttackIQ BAS) integration may carry additional licensing costs. With ~55 total employees, surge capacity during a major incident is unclear and may require external escalation | No public pricing at all. Expect an enterprise sales process with no self-serve benchmarks.. Google Chronicle license may be billed separately depending on delivery model. Clarify before signing.. DFIR is always a separate retainer, not included in base MDR.. Identity-first approach may require upfront IAM assessment and remediation work before MDR is fully operational. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC regions | EuropeLatin America | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not publicly disclosed | Varies by environment. One enterprise case study references a 6-month parallel migration. Smaller deployments likely faster, but no published timeline. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailCritical InfrastructureSmart Cities | Healthcare & Life SciencesFinancial ServicesGaming & EntertainmentRetailLegal ServicesManufacturingPharmaceutical/Biotech |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Almost no English-language reviews exist. A handful of Gartner Peer Insights entries are positive, praising communication and dashboards. Zero reviews on G2 or PeerSpot, so community validation is essentially absent. | Gartner Peer Insights 5.0/5 from a single review. No G2 or Capterra listings. PeerSpot ranks #41 in MDR with 0 collected reviews. Glassdoor 3.2/5. Virtually no independent customer validation despite analyst recognition. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001GDPR | SOC 2ISO 27001 |
| Certifications | ISO 27001 | SOC 2ISO 27001 |
| Founded | 2014 | 2003 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | Data stored in Google Chronicle/BigQuery. Retention periods customizable per contract. Chronicle provides 12 months of hot data by default. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Ackcent Cybersecurity and Cyderes?
Ackcent Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Ackcent Cybersecurity and Cyderes differ in response capabilities?
Ackcent Cybersecurity supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Cyderes supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Ackcent Cybersecurity and not included with Cyderes.
How does Ackcent Cybersecurity pricing compare to Cyderes?
Ackcent Cybersecurity pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Cyderes pricing: Not publicly disclosed.. Watch for with Ackcent Cybersecurity: Advisory, Red Team, AppSec, and Training services are separate from base MDR; No public pricing makes cost comparison impossible without direct sales engagement. Watch for with Cyderes: No public pricing at all. Expect an enterprise sales process with no self-serve benchmarks.; Google Chronicle license may be billed separately depending on delivery model. Clarify before signing..
Should I choose Ackcent Cybersecurity or Cyderes?
Choose Ackcent Cybersecurity if: european or LATAM mid-market companies that want a boutique provider with native Spanish and English support. Choose Cyderes if: google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR. Ackcent Cybersecurity is not ideal for enterprises that need documented SLAs, published detection metrics, or transparent pricing before signing. Cyderes is not ideal for sMBs or buyers needing transparent, published pricing.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.