CyberCX vs Tesorion
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberCX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. CyberCX includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberCX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. CyberCX includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
CyberCX (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize CyberCX's regional anz leader with 9 crest-accredited socs, ~1,400 security professionals, and microsoft ad... or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | ANZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- ANZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberCXTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Azure SentinelSplunk | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, Microsoft security modules monitored, and coverage scope. No public pricing available. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Microsoft Defender XDR and Azure Sentinel licenses are customer-purchased prerequisites, not included in the managed SOC fee. Microsoft security stack must be built, tuned, and configured to CyberCX standards before monitoring can begin, adding weeks to months of onboarding. No public pricing. Requires direct sales engagement to get any cost estimate. Accenture acquisition (closed Feb 2026) may change service models, pricing structures, or contract terms during integration | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-PacificEurope | Europe |
| Onboarding | Weeks to months. Requires expert build, tuning, and configuration of the Microsoft security stack before monitoring begins. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentCritical InfrastructureFinancial ServicesHealthcareEducationTechnology | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | CREST Level 2 accredited with strong ANZ presence, but almost no independent reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights. Known regionally for Microsoft expertise and DFIR capability (250+ breaches/year). The Accenture acquisition creates uncertainty around service continuity. Minimal discussion on Reddit or practitioner forums compared to global MDR providers. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | CREST SOC Level 2ISO 27001GDPR supportDORA support | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | CREST SOC Level 2Microsoft Advanced Specialization - Threat ProtectionMicrosoft Advanced Specialization - Identity and Access ManagementMicrosoft Advanced Specialization - Cloud Security | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published. Governed by customer's own Microsoft Sentinel retention settings. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between CyberCX and Tesorion?
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). CyberCX covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do CyberCX and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
CyberCX supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with CyberCX and not included with Tesorion.
How does CyberCX pricing compare to Tesorion?
CyberCX pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with CyberCX: Microsoft Defender XDR and Azure Sentinel licenses are customer-purchased prerequisites, not included in the managed SOC fee; Microsoft security stack must be built, tuned, and configured to CyberCX standards before monitoring can begin, adding weeks to months of onboarding. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose CyberCX or Tesorion?
Choose CyberCX if: aNZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. CyberCX is not ideal for organizations outside ANZ or UK that need global SOC coverage across North America, LATAM, or broader APAC. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.