Cipher vs Orange Cyberdefense
Cipher and Orange Cyberdefense are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Orange Cyberdefense serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 5 for Orange Cyberdefense (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Cipher and Orange Cyberdefense are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Orange Cyberdefense serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 5 for Orange Cyberdefense (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Orange Cyberdefense offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 0). Cipher may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools | Large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence |
| Price | Custom quote | Azure package: EUR 3,300/mo for 300 users |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence
- Price
- Azure package: EUR 3,300/mo for 300 users
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CipherTECH-AGNOSTIC | Orange CyberdefenseTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | Microsoft DefenderPalo Alto Cortex |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft SentinelPalo Alto Cortex XSIAM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Azure Marketplace: Managed Threat Detection [XDR] for Defender Endpoint P2: 3,300 EUR/month for 300 users. Managed Threat Detection [log] for Sentinel: 16,500 EUR/month up to 50 GB/day. Third-party estimate: avg ~$37K/year, max ~$100K/year. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Cipher does not publish xMDR package pricing. | Enterprise custom pricing. Some SKUs listed on Azure Marketplace with fixed monthly rates. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The site names EDR and IPS/IDS integration but does not publish named vendor integrations.. Response wording is broad, so buyers should document pre-approved actions before go-live. | Core MDR platforms are Microsoft Defender or Palo Alto Cortex, licensing costs are separate. Multiple add-on services (threat intelligence, cybercrime monitoring, brand protection) add up. Non-European buyers may find fewer local SOC analysts and slower regional support outside EMEA hours. No published rate card or minimum seat count, making it hard to budget without a sales conversation. Sentinel consumption costs (if using Microsoft platform) are separate |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, xMDR Services, xMDR Platform | Annual, Multi-year enterprise agreements |
| Channels | Portal | PortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeLATAM | EuropeNorth AmericaAfricaAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Cipher advertises 20 days for full service activation, but buyers should confirm scope and contract timing. | Not publicly specified. Expect enterprise-scale timelines. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareProfessional ServicesPayments | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetail/DistributionEnergyTransportGovernment/Public SectorIndustrial/OTManufacturing |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Cipher's Prosegur ownership, xMDR Platform, 24/7 SOC claim, six-SOC footprint, portal access and existing-stack positioning. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and SOC delivery details directly. | Strong analyst recognition: Forrester Strong Performer for MDR Europe (Q3 2025), IDC MarketScape European MDR Leader (2024). Zero practitioner reviews found on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit, which makes independent validation impossible. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC 1SOC 2PCI DSSCREST | SOC 2 Type 2PCI DSS (QSA and ASV)ANSSI (French national cybersecurity agency)CRESTNATO Security Accreditation |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC ISOC IIPCI QSAPCI ASVCRESTTF-CSIRTCIPHER-CSIRT RFC2350 | SOC 2 Type 2PCI DSS QSA (Qualified Security Assessor)PCI DSS ASV (Approved Scanning Vendor)ANSSI PASSI RGS/LPM, PDIS LPM, PRISCREST (international infosec accreditation)FIRST MembershipNATO Security AccreditationTF-CSIRT (European task force)Europol PartnershipMicrosoft Solutions Partner (Security, Azure) |
| Founded | – | 2014 |
| Data retention | Cipher says all platform information is online 24/7 and available from any device. No public standard MDR data-retention period was found. | Not publicly specified |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cipher and Orange Cyberdefense?
Cipher is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Orange Cyberdefense is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cipher covers 0 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Orange Cyberdefense.
How do Cipher and Orange Cyberdefense differ in response capabilities?
Cipher supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Orange Cyberdefense supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Cipher pricing compare to Orange Cyberdefense?
Cipher pricing: Not published. Orange Cyberdefense pricing: Azure Marketplace: Managed Threat Detection [XDR] for Defender Endpoint P2: 3,300 EUR/month for 300 users. Managed Threat Detection [log] for Sentinel: 16,500 EUR/month up to 50 GB/day. Third-party estimate: avg ~$37K/year, max ~$100K/year.. Watch for with Cipher: Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Watch for with Orange Cyberdefense: Core MDR platforms are Microsoft Defender or Palo Alto Cortex, licensing costs are separate; Multiple add-on services (threat intelligence, cybercrime monitoring, brand protection) add up.
Should I choose Cipher or Orange Cyberdefense?
Choose Cipher if: mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools. Choose Orange Cyberdefense if: large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence. Cipher is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Orange Cyberdefense is not ideal for sMBs or cost-sensitive buyers, as pricing is enterprise-tier with no public rate cards.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.