BlueVoyant vs Check Point
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Check Point is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. BlueVoyant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Check Point serves Mid-market and Enterprise. BlueVoyant includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 5 for Check Point (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Check Point is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. BlueVoyant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Check Point serves Mid-market and Enterprise. BlueVoyant includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 5 for Check Point (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
BlueVoyant (Pure-play MDR) and Check Point (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize BlueVoyant's the strongest microsoft sentinel mdr option for organizations that want their detection rules, pl... or Check Point's best fit for check point infrastructure customers who want their mdr team to operate on the same ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance | Enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | BlueVoyantTECH-AGNOSTIC | Check PointTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOneCarbon Black | Check Point Harmony Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelSplunk | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Contact for custom quote. | Custom-quoted. Generally perceived as premium pricing relative to competitors. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Subscription-based, priced per endpoint for laptops, workstations, and servers. All log sources included in the per-endpoint price. Also available via AWS Marketplace and Azure Marketplace. | Per-user subscription with one-year and multi-year plans. Three tiers: MDR (endpoint and API monitoring), MDR 360 (adds identity protection, expanded integrations, XDR/XPR access), MXDR 360 (adds managed SIEM and data lake). |
| Hidden cost warnings | Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing. Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track. Very few public reviews (6 on Gartner, 0 on PeerSpot) make it hard to validate claims before buying. No published response time SLA. Ask for written commitments before signing | ATAM 360 (dedicated account management) is an additional subscription on top of MDR. Licensing complexity is a recurring PeerSpot complaint, plan for negotiation cycles. Identity protection and expanded integrations require the MDR 360 tier, not the base MDR tier. PeerSpot reviewers consistently flag Check Point licensing and support costs as higher than competitors |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | 1 year, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmail | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Deployment involves configuring data connectors and playbooks within the customer's existing SIEM. | Integration via APIs and endpoint agents |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentDefense | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTelecommunicationsManufacturingCritical InfrastructureRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published as an absolute figure. Forrester TEI study (Sep 2024) found 70% reduction in mean time to resolution for BlueVoyant MDR clients. | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.5/5 (6 reviews). Named in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for MDR. Strong Microsoft credentials (Partner of the Year, 500+ Sentinel deployments). Very limited public review data makes independent validation difficult. | PeerSpot rates Check Point Infinity 8.8/10 (platform-level, not MDR-specific). Premium pricing, licensing complexity, and technical support delays are persistent complaints across PeerSpot reviews. MDR-specific community feedback is minimal. Most reviews cover the Infinity platform broadly, not the MDR service layer. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAAPCI DSS |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (annual audit)Microsoft Worldwide Security Partner of the Year 2024Three-time Microsoft US Security Partner of the YearUK G-Cloud accreditedSplunk Premier Manage partner | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 |
| Founded | 2017 | 1993 |
| Data retention | Data stays in customer's own SIEM instance. Retention governed by customer's Sentinel/Splunk configuration. | Not publicly disclosed. MXDR 360 tier includes a data lake for long-term retention and compliance. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between BlueVoyant and Check Point?
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Check Point is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). BlueVoyant covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Check Point.
How do BlueVoyant and Check Point differ in response capabilities?
BlueVoyant supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Check Point supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with BlueVoyant and included with Check Point.
How does BlueVoyant pricing compare to Check Point?
BlueVoyant pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. Check Point pricing: Custom-quoted. Generally perceived as premium pricing relative to competitors.. Watch for with BlueVoyant: Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing; Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track. Watch for with Check Point: ATAM 360 (dedicated account management) is an additional subscription on top of MDR; Licensing complexity is a recurring PeerSpot complaint, plan for negotiation cycles.
Should I choose BlueVoyant or Check Point?
Choose BlueVoyant if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender wanting MDR without a proprietary agent. Choose Check Point if: enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management. BlueVoyant is not ideal for organizations needing broad multi-vendor integration support. BlueVoyant supports four EDR platforms and two SIEMs, far fewer than competitors like Expel or eSentire. Check Point is not ideal for budget-conscious buyers or SMBs who need predictable, transparent pricing.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.