Arctic Wolf vs Check Point: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Arctic Wolf and Check Point managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Check Point
More hands-on response
SLA Speed
Check Point
Faster response time
Coverage Breadth
Tie
Same coverage
Integrations
Tie
Similar breadth
Criteria
Best-in-class concierge model for mid-market organizations needing a dedicated security partner. Technology-agnostic design avoids vendor lock-in. $3M warranty is the industry's largest. Trade-off is limited data transparency and guided (not active) remediation.
Enterprise-grade MDR backed by ThreatCloud AI and 450+ security experts, with an industry-leading 160+ integrations for vendor-neutral coverage. Best for organizations wanting comprehensive coverage across all attack surfaces from a vendor with deep network security heritage.
Response Type
Guided Response
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
Configurable
Configurable
Auto-Isolate
✓
✓
Kill Process
✓
✓
IR Included
Separate
✓ Included
Response SLA
≤1 hour
≤30 minutes
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
EmailPortalPhone
EmailPortalPhone
Data Access
Dashboards
Dashboards
Model
Per-user monthly pricing; tiered by user count and contract term
Subscription-based with one-year and multi-year plans; per-user or deployment size based; three tiers (MDR, MDR 360, MXDR 360)
Price Range
Starting ~$20/user/month; MDR Basic ~$44,000/year for up to 100 users. Enterprise pricing is custom.
Custom-quoted; pricing based on scale, modules, and deployment size. Generally perceived as high-end/premium pricing.
Minimum Seats
None
None
Threat Hunting
✓ Included
✓ Included
Overall
Positive
Mixed
Summary
Highly rated with strong praise for the Concierge Security Team model and ease of use. Criticisms center on false positives, limited data transparency, and the guided (rather than hands-on) response model.
Valued by large enterprises already in the Check Point ecosystem as a powerful security partner. Strong detection capabilities backed by ThreatCloud AI and 450+ experts. However, perceived as expensive, with licensing complexity and limited appeal outside the existing Check Point customer base.
Arctic Wolf vs Check Point: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Arctic Wolf if:
- You need guided response
- ≤1 hour response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / Enterprise
Choose Check Point if:
- You need active remediation
- ≤30 minutes response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market / Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Arctic Wolf and Check Point?
Key differences: response model (Guided Response vs Active Remediation), SLA (≤1 hour vs ≤30 minutes), and approach (Technology Agnostic vs Technology Agnostic).