Arctic Wolf vs BlueVoyant
Arctic Wolf and BlueVoyant are both Pure-play MDRs that work with your existing tools. Arctic Wolf targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while BlueVoyant serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Arctic Wolf and BlueVoyant are both Pure-play MDRs that work with your existing tools. Arctic Wolf targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while BlueVoyant serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service | Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance |
| Price | $12-18/endpoint/mo | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | $3,000,000 | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service
- Price
- $12-18/endpoint/mo
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- $3,000,000
- Best fit
- Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Arctic WolfTECH-AGNOSTIC | BlueVoyantTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Arctic Wolf AgentAurora Endpoint SecuritySentinelOne SingularityCrowdStrike FalconFortiEDRMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOneCarbon Black |
| SIEM integrations | Aurora Platform | Microsoft SentinelSplunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainDisable accounts | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Third-party buyer data reports Arctic Wolf MDR observed pricing around $12-18/endpoint/month for 100-500 endpoint buyers and $8-14/endpoint/month for 1,000+ endpoint buyers. AWS Marketplace also lists MDR Basic starting at $44,000/year for up to 100 users. | Not published. Contact for custom quote. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | $3,000,000 | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | ≤1 hour | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user pricing with multiple license types. Limited User ~$20/user/month, Standard User ~$200/user/month. Aurora Managed Endpoint Defense ~$110/device/month. Bundled in Core, Plus, and Total tiers with Silver/Gold/Platinum concierge levels. | Subscription-based, priced per endpoint for laptops, workstations, and servers. All log sources included in the per-endpoint price. Also available via AWS Marketplace and Azure Marketplace. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Remediation is guided, not performed on your behalf. May need a separate IR retainer for hands-on incident response.. Normalized data and threat feeds are not directly accessible. You get dashboards and reports, not raw data.. $3M warranty requires Aurora Managed Endpoint Defense plus a Security Operations Bundle, creating platform dependency.. Multiple license types (Limited at $20, Standard at $200) at very different price points. Clarify which applies to your deployment.. Full security posture takes several months in complex environments despite a 30-day onboarding target. | Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing. Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track. Very few public reviews (6 on Gartner, 0 on PeerSpot) make it hard to validate claims before buying. No published response time SLA. Ask for written commitments before signing |
| Data portability | Limited | Full |
| Contract terms | Annual, 2-year, 3-year | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmail |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | 30 days or less with a dedicated onboarding team. Full security posture takes several months in complex environments. | Not published. Deployment involves configuring data connectors and playbooks within the customer's existing SIEM. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareTechnologyManufacturingRetailGovernment | Financial ServicesGovernmentDefense |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published. Arctic Wolf reports ~7-minute Mean Time to Ticket (alert to ticket creation), which is not the same as MTTR. | Not published as an absolute figure. Forrester TEI study (Sep 2024) found 70% reduction in mean time to resolution for BlueVoyant MDR clients. |
| Community view | Polarizing along predictable lines. Gartner Peer Insights rates 4.8/5 (451+ reviews) and G2 4.7/5 (~276 reviews), with mid-market customers praising the Concierge model. Reddit and practitioner forums are more critical, with recurring complaints about false positive rates, limited data transparency, and guided-not-hands-on remediation. PeerSpot mindshare dropped ~48% year-over-year. | Gartner Peer Insights 4.5/5 (6 reviews). Named in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for MDR. Strong Microsoft credentials (Partner of the Year, 500+ Sentinel deployments). Very limited public review data makes independent validation difficult. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001CMMCPCI DSSHIPAAFTC Safeguards Rule | SOC 2 Type II |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2013 | SOC 2 Type II (annual audit)Microsoft Worldwide Security Partner of the Year 2024Three-time Microsoft US Security Partner of the YearUK G-Cloud accreditedSplunk Premier Manage partner |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Data retention | 90 days standard. Extended retention available as add-on (up to 10 years). Data sovereignty options: US, Canada, Germany, or Australia. | Data stays in customer's own SIEM instance. Retention governed by customer's Sentinel/Splunk configuration. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Arctic Wolf and BlueVoyant?
Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Arctic Wolf offers ≤1 hour, BlueVoyant offers Not disclosed.
How do Arctic Wolf and BlueVoyant differ in response capabilities?
Arctic Wolf supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. BlueVoyant supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Arctic Wolf pricing compare to BlueVoyant?
Arctic Wolf pricing: Third-party buyer data reports Arctic Wolf MDR observed pricing around $12-18/endpoint/month for 100-500 endpoint buyers and $8-14/endpoint/month for 1,000+ endpoint buyers. AWS Marketplace also lists MDR Basic starting at $44,000/year for up to 100 users.. BlueVoyant pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. Watch for with Arctic Wolf: Remediation is guided, not performed on your behalf. May need a separate IR retainer for hands-on incident response.; Normalized data and threat feeds are not directly accessible. You get dashboards and reports, not raw data.. Watch for with BlueVoyant: Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing; Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track.
Should I choose Arctic Wolf or BlueVoyant?
Choose Arctic Wolf if: mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service. Choose BlueVoyant if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender wanting MDR without a proprietary agent. Arctic Wolf is not ideal for security teams that want direct access to raw telemetry, custom detection engineering, or SIEM query capabilities. BlueVoyant is not ideal for organizations needing broad multi-vendor integration support. BlueVoyant supports four EDR platforms and two SIEMs, far fewer than competitors like Expel or eSentire.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.