Bitdefender MDR vs Huntress: MDR Comparison 2026
Bitdefender MDR (EDR vendor) and Huntress (MSP-channel) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Bitdefender MDR requires its own security platform, while Huntress requires its own security platform. Bitdefender MDR targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Huntress focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Bitdefender MDR includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Huntress (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Bitdefender MDR vs Huntress: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Bitdefender MDR if:
- •Mid-market organizations (50-200+ endpoints) wanting single-vendor MDR + EPP/EDR/XDR
- •Organizations already using or willing to adopt GravityZone
- •MSPs looking for affordable, multi-tenant MDR with consumption billing
- •You need Cloud and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Bottom line: Bitdefender MDR (EDR vendor) and Huntress (MSP-channel) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Bitdefender MDR's mitre-validated detection quality (24-min mttd, lowest fp rate) on a single-vendor gravityzone pl... or Huntress's the msp community's gold standard for smb-focused mdr.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Bitdefender MDR and Huntress?
Bitdefender MDR is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Bitdefender MDR offers ≤30 minutes, Huntress offers Not disclosed. Bitdefender MDR covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Huntress.
How do Bitdefender MDR and Huntress differ in response capabilities?
Bitdefender MDR supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Bitdefender MDR and not included with Huntress.
How does Bitdefender MDR pricing compare to Huntress?
Bitdefender MDR pricing: MDR Core ~$6.99/endpoint/month, MDR Advanced ~$10.49/endpoint/month, MDR Enterprise ~$14.99/endpoint/month. MDR Foundations and MDR PLUS pricing not publicly disclosed.. Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Watch for with Bitdefender MDR: Requires GravityZone agent — cannot use third-party EDR for core MDR detection; XDR sensor licenses (network, identity, cloud, email) are additional cost. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up.
Should I choose Bitdefender MDR or Huntress?
Choose Bitdefender MDR if: mid-market organizations (50-200+ endpoints) wanting single-vendor MDR + EPP/EDR/XDR. Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Bitdefender MDR is not ideal for organizations with an existing non-Bitdefender EDR they want to keep (requires GravityZone agent). Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle.